Overview
Assets Under Management: $169 million
Headquarters: LOS ANGELES, CA
High-Net-Worth Clients: 24
Average Client Assets: $7 million
Services Offered
Services: Portfolio Management for Individuals
Fee Structure
Primary Fee Schedule (R.H. DINEL INVESTMENT COUNSEL, INC. ADV PART 2A BROCHURE)
Min | Max | Marginal Fee Rate |
---|---|---|
$0 | $1,000,000 | 1.50% |
$1,000,001 | $2,000,000 | 1.25% |
$2,000,001 | $22,000,000 | 1.00% |
Illustrative Fee Rates
Total Assets | Annual Fees | Average Fee Rate |
---|---|---|
$1 million | $15,000 | 1.50% |
$5 million | $57,500 | 1.15% |
$10 million | $107,500 | 1.08% |
$50 million | $227,500 | 0.46% |
$100 million | $227,500 | 0.23% |
Clients
Number of High-Net-Worth Clients: 24
Percentage of Firm Assets Belonging to High-Net-Worth Clients: 95.60
Average High-Net-Worth Client Assets: $7 million
Total Client Accounts: 29
Discretionary Accounts: 28
Non-Discretionary Accounts: 1
Regulatory Filings
CRD Number: 106688
Last Filing Date: 2025-03-05 00:00:00
Website: https://www.rhdic.com/
Form ADV Documents
Primary Brochure: R.H. DINEL INVESTMENT COUNSEL, INC. ADV PART 2A BROCHURE (2025-03-05)
View Document Text
R. H. DINEL INVESTMENT COUNSEL, INC.
F O R M A D V P A R T 2 A
B R O C H U R E
MARCH 5, 2025
11661 SAN VICENTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 400
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90049-5112
(310) 571-7171; FAX (310) 571-3344
CONTACT: RICHARD H. DINEL
This brochure provides information about the qualifications and business practices of R. H. Dinel
Investment Counsel, Inc. If you have any questions about the contents of this brochure, please
contact us at (310) 571-7171. The information in this brochure has not been approved or verified by
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or by any state securities authority.
Additional information about R. H. Dinel Investment Counsel, Inc. is also available on the SEC’s
website at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov.
We sometimes refer to our firm as a “registered investment advisor” because we are registered with
various governmental authorities. This reference does not imply any particular level of skill or
training.
Table of Contents
Page
Advisory Services ........................................................................................................... 1
History of Our Business .......................................................................................... 1
Services We Provide .............................................................................................. 1
Customization of Advisory Services ....................................................................... 1
Client Assets Under Our Management ................................................................... 1
Fees and Compensation. ................................................................................................ 1
Our Advisory Fee Schedule .................................................................................... 1
Payment of Our Advisory Fees ............................................................................... 2
Other Fees Our Clients Will Incur ........................................................................... 2
Refunds of Advisory Fees ...................................................................................... 2
Our Clients ....................................................................................................................... 2
Customization of Investment Strategies; Methods of Analysis; Risk of Loss ........... 2
Our Approach to the Investment Process ............................................................... 2
Our Method of Analysis .......................................................................................... 3
Risks of Investing in Common Stocks and Bonds .................................................. 3
Our Code of Ethics and Practices Relating to Trades by Our Personnel ................... 4
Our Code of Ethics ................................................................................................. 4
Practices Relating to Trades by Our Personnel ...................................................... 4
Our Practices with Respect to Brokers ......................................................................... 4
Portfolio Review Process and Reports to Clients ........................................................ 5
Our Agreements with Clients ......................................................................................... 5
Voting of Clients’ Securities ........................................................................................... 6
Our Executive Officers .................................................................................................... 6
Advisory Services
History of Our Business
Our firm commenced business on April 1, 1992 at the location identified on the cover page.
Its principal owner until September 18, 2013 was Richard H. Dinel. Since September 18,
2013, Richard H. Dinel retains the sole right to vote 100% of the shares of R. H. Dinel
Investment Counsel, Inc. however ownership of these shares resides in the Dinel Family
Trust. The sole Trustees of the Dinel Family Trust are Richard H. Dinel and Joyce K. Dinel.
Services We Provide
We provide customized, discretionary, investment management services. We place great
emphasis on research relating to individual securities. Our goal is to hold investments for a
long period of time. We believe these long holding periods provide the best returns for our
clients.
Customization of Advisory Services
Each of our client portfolios is slightly different from any other client portfolio. This is
because each portfolio of securities is designed to conform to the particular needs of each
client. These needs are determined after consultations with the client, and if appropriate,
their accountant and/or lawyer. Clients may impose restrictions on investing in
corporations which do not meet their political or social objectives.
Client Assets Under Our Management
As of December 31, 2024, we managed $169,325,694 of client assets on a discretionary
basis. Upon request by a client, we will manage some portion of their portfolio on a non-
discretionary basis. As of December 31, 2024, we managed portions of one portfolio
totaling $150,000 on a non-discretionary basis.
Fees and Compensation
Our Advisory Fee Schedule
Our annual fees for management of portfolios are as follows:
A.
1.5% of assets for the first $1 million under management.
B.
1.25% of assets for the next $1 million under management.
C.
1% of assets for the next $20 million under management.
1
Under certain circumstances, we may negotiate fees which may vary from the schedule
set forth above.
As a separate and distinct service, if requested to do so, we will consult with individuals or
organizations about investment problems. Our hourly fee for such consultations is $1,500
per hour. Fees for this service are billed directly to the client.
Payment of Our Advisory Fees
Our advisory fees are deducted each quarter in advance directly from client portfolios.
Clients are sent a copy of the bill on the same date the bill is sent to the custodian of their
portfolio of securities.
Other Fees Our Clients Will Incur
Our clients will incur nominal fees to the custodian of their portfolio of securities. We
believe utilization of an independent bank as custodian provides an additional level of
safety for our clients’ securities holdings. Some clients also find the service of the
custodian to be an added convenience. In addition, we utilize third party brokers to execute
transactions. Please see “Our Practices with Respect to Brokers” below.
Refunds of Advisory Fees
Our Investment Advisory Agreement provides that either party may terminate the
Investment Advisory Agreement upon 30 days written notice. Subject to the 30 day notice
provision, the unearned portion of our fee for the quarter during which the termination
occurs will be refunded.
Our Clients
Our clients are individuals, individual retirement accounts, trusts, pensions and
foundations. The minimum assets a client must place under our management in
connection with a new relationship is $2 million. Under certain circumstances, we may
decrease or increase this minimum.
Customization of Investment Strategies; Methods of Analysis; Risk of Loss
Our Approach to the Investment Process
A.
After consultation with the client, and if appropriate, their accountant and/or lawyer,
the client’s needs are determined.
2
B.
As a result of this determination, stock/bond mix parameters are recommended to
the client, and if appropriate, their accountant and/or lawyer. These recommended
parameters also include which of our common stock portfolio management
guidelines is most appropriate for the client.
C. When these recommendations are accepted or modified, a letter delineating the
investment policy as accepted or modified is sent to the client.
Our Method of Analysis
We place considerable emphasis on common stocks because, over long periods of time,
they have produced the highest returns of any category of liquid assets.
Our universe of stocks is constantly reviewed. Promising candidates are screened and
then subjected to in-depth research. This includes a review of filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission as well as annual reports, research from independent research
providers and from various brokerage firms.
We attempt to identify great businesses in the right industries which are well managed.
Such businesses should, over time, produce outstanding returns because their earnings,
or cash flows, consistently grow faster than the economy in general.
We augment this basic premise of growth stock investing with a further premise that if a
company is positioned to take advantage of important economic themes, it should
outperform the universe of growth companies in general. Economic themes are concepts
which are often self evident , e.g. the concern for the environment, the ongoing revolution
in telecommunications and information technology, the expanding demand for American
consumer products abroad and the increasing wealth of developing countries.
For some investors, it is appropriate that we invest all, or a portion, of their portfolio in
bonds issued by the U.S. Government, its agencies and instrumentalities, corporations or
municipalities.
Risks of Investing in Common Stocks and Bonds
The long term returns provided by common stocks are higher than those provided by any
other class of liquid assets. However, such returns are not consistent. They can be quite
volatile. Thus, investors in common stocks can expect to be subject to volatility or risks
relating to economic conditions, market fluctuation, world events, and events affecting
particular companies or industries.
Investors in bonds are subject to the risk the issuer of the bond will default, or the bond will
decline in current value due to market perceptions of the ability of the issuer of the bond to
repay the obligation. Additionally, if interest rates in general rise, the current value of all
bonds will be affected adversely. A bond will be worth its par value at maturity except if the
issuer of the bond defaults.
3
Our Code of Ethics and Practices Relating to Trades by Our Personnel
Our Code of Ethics
Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 204 A-1, effective February 1,
2005, we adopted a Code of Ethics. This Code of Ethics reemphasizes the high standards
of conduct which we have always observed. It emphasizes that many of our clients repose
an unusual degree of confidence and trust in us and we must, therefore, continue to live up
to the very high level of expectation inherent in our relationships with our clients, as well as
our fiduciary obligations. It also recognizes that in many instances, clients have placed
virtually all of their liquid assets under our management.
We will provide a copy of our Code of Ethics to any client or prospective client upon
request.
Practices Relating to Trades by Our Personnel
Our employees are required to obtain the prior written consent of Richard H. Dinel,
President, for any trades done in their own accounts. Such trades may take place in
securities which are the same as securities being purchased or sold on behalf of clients.
However, no such transactions are permitted if, in the opinion of Richard H. Dinel, such
transactions would cause economic harm to clients.
If our officer’s or employee’s transactions are occurring at, or about, the same time as
transactions are being executed for clients, the transactions on behalf of our officers or
employees are executed after the transactions for clients are executed.
Our Practices with Respect to Brokers
Our Investment Advisory Agreements provide in most instances that we have approval to
execute transactions with various brokers. Our Investment Advisory Agreement also
provides our clients with the option to direct us to use only their own broker; in which case
we will not negotiate commissions or execution terms on the clients’ behalf.
We select brokers on the basis of their research and execution capability. The
determination of reasonableness of brokerage commissions is made on consideration of:
1) execution capability, 2) quality of research, 3) breadth of research, and 4) gross amount
of commissions. “Quality of research” relates to access to analysts and the quality and
frequency of written reports dealing with individual companies and industries.
We may pay a broker a commission in excess of that which another broker might have
charged for executing the same transaction in recognition of the value of: a) execution
capability or b) research services provided by the broker.
4
All purchases and sales of securities in our clients’ portfolios, as well as the brokerage firm
utilized and the commission paid, are shown on the monthly statements our clients receive
from the custodian of their portfolio of securities. See “Portfolio Review Process and
Reports to Clients” below.
The research services provided by brokers may be used for the benefit of all portfolios,
including those of our officers or employees. Also, some of the research services provided
by brokerage firms are so extensive that not all such services are used by the portfolio(s)
which paid the commission.
Under certain circumstances, trades executed for one client portfolio may be aggregated
with trades done for other client portfolios provided that the aggregation is done on the
same day, in the same security. Positions resulting from such trades are apportioned to
the various participating client portfolios on an average cost basis, and our clients’
portfolios benefit from any savings which may result from such aggregation.
It is worth noting that we may select a broker based upon our interest in receiving research
from that broker rather than the interest of a specific client in receiving the lowest cost
execution. The only services our firm, or any related persons, receive from brokers are
research issued by the brokerage firm itself or by other providers.
We do not allow brokers to pay for any independent research subscriptions or other
services which we receive directly. We direct client transactions to brokers in return for
their research services and execution capabilities and for no other reason.
Portfolio Review Process and Reports to Clients
We review all client portfolios at least quarterly, and often more frequently. Such reviews
are conducted by Richard H. Dinel, President. Unusual developments in the financial
markets or involving a particular industry or company will trigger a special review.
We provide our clients with quarterly analytical reports. Clients receive monthly account
statements from the custodian of their portfolio of securities. Clients who obtain a secure
password from the custodian may view the status of, and activity in, their portfolio(s) on the
website of the custodian. Clients should carefully review their statements from the
custodian of their portfolio of securities. Our quarterly analytical reports should be
compared to these statements.
Our Agreements with Clients
All of our clients’ portfolios are managed pursuant to a written Investment Advisory
Agreement which confers upon us discretionary authority to manage the portfolios on
behalf of our clients. Such authority is exercised in accordance with the investment policy
described in “Our Approach to the Investment Process” above.
5
Voting of Clients’ Securities
We vote all proxies pertaining to client securities. Pursuant to SEC Rule 206(4)-6 on
August 6, 2003, we adopted Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures. A copy of this
document is available to clients upon request. We encounter few, if any, conflicts of
interest because we are a small firm. Thus, we do not hold unusually large positions in
securities on behalf of our clients or our officers. We vote proxies relating to shareholdings
of our officers in exactly the same way as we vote proxies for clients. Upon request, clients
may obtain information from us about how we voted proxies relating to their securities.
Our Executive Officers
Our principal executive officers are Richard H. Dinel, President, and Joyce K. Dinel, Vice
President.
Richard H. Dinel holds a J.D. degree from Stanford University and a B.A. degree from
Pomona College with a major in history and a minor in economics. He practiced securities
law for 25 years until 1992 when he founded R. H. Dinel Investment Counsel, Inc.
Joyce K. Dinel was a trust officer of a large Los Angeles bank. She retired from the bank in
1975. Between 1975 and 1992, she concentrated on raising the Dinel family. In 1992, she
was a co-founder of R. H. Dinel Investment Counsel, Inc.
ADVPart2A Brochure 2025
6