View Document Text
FORM ADV DISCLOSURE BROCHURE
1919 INVESTMENT COUNSEL, LLC
One South Street, Suite 2500 Baltimore, MD 21202
(410) 454-2171/ (888) 770-5642
WWW.1919IC.COM
March 31, 2025
This brochure provides information about the qualifications and business practices of 1919 Investment
Counsel, LLC (“1919”). If you have questions about the contents of this brochure, please contact us at
(410) 454-2171. The information in this brochure has not been approved or verified by the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or by any state securities authority.
1919 Investment Counsel, LLC is a registered investment adviser. Additional information about 1919
Investment Counsel, LLC is available on the SEC’s website at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov. Investment
adviser registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training.
1 | P a g e
ITEM 2. MATERIAL CHANGES
There have been no material changes since the last filing of the Form ADV.
2 | P a g e
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item 1.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 10.
Item 11.
1
2
3
4
8
11
11
11
19
19
20
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
Item 15.
Item 16.
Item 17.
Item 18.
Cover Page
Material Changes
Table of Contents
Advisory Business
Fees and Compensation
Performance-Based Fees and Side-by-Side Management
Type of Clients
Methods of Analysis, Investment Strategies and Risk of Loss
Disciplinary Information
Other Financial Industry Activities and Affiliations
Code of Ethics, Participation or Interest in Client Transactions and Personal
Trading
Brokerage Practices
Review of Accounts
Client Referrals and Other Compensation
Custody
Investment Discretion
Voting Client Securities
Financial Information
21
28
28
28
29
29
30
3 | P a g e
ITEM 4. ADVISORY BUSINESS
A.
Firm Description
Founded in 1919, 1919 Investment Counsel, LLC ("1919") has been a wholly-owned subsidiary of Stifel Financial Corp.
(“Stifel”), a publicly held company whose common stock trades under the symbol “SF”, since November 8, 2014, when it was
acquired from Legg Mason, Inc. 1919 was originally founded as Scudder Stevens & Clark and later known as Scudder Private
Investment Counsel while under the ownership of Zurich Insurance Co., from 1997 to 2001, and Deutsche Bank from 2002
to 2004.1
A group of senior 1919 management professionals are responsible for the management structures, and policies and procedures
for the operation and development of the firm. Harry O’Mealia, Chief Executive Officer, Faith Mutunga, Director of Finance
and Director of Human Resources, Charles C. King, Chief Investment Officer, Brian Gallagher, Chief Administrative Officer,
Reshma Ballie McGowan, Chief Compliance Officer and the firm’s Operating Committee, comprise this group of executives.
1919 is a Maryland limited liability company formed in 2004 and is registered with the SEC as an investment adviser. As of
December 31, 2024, 1919 managed approximately $23.9 billion of both discretionary and non-discretionary assets. 1919 is a
separately registered investment adviser that generally operates independently of other Stifel-affiliated advisers and broker-
dealers. Information about 1919’s qualifications, business practices, portfolio management techniques and affiliates is
accessible on our website at www.1919ic.com.
B. Advisory Services
When we serve as investment adviser to clients, we are considered to have a fiduciary relationship with the client and are
therefore held to the legal standards set forth in the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, certain state laws, and common law
standards applicable to fiduciaries. These standards include the duty of care, including the obligation to have a reasonable basis
for believing that our investment recommendations are suitable and consistent with each client’s stated objectives and goals,
and the duty of loyalty, including the obligation to provide the client with full disclosure of material conflicts of interest. It is
1919’s philosophy to put our clients’ interests first and to provide investment services based on client-driven guidelines. Our
duties differ depending on the authority that a client has granted us and the services that we have agreed to provide – for
example, whether we have agreed to provide non-discretionary versus discretionary services or when we provide episodic (e.g.,
financial planning) versus continuous advice. 1919’s core business is providing comprehensive investment counsel services
including, but not limited to, equity, fixed income, and private funds, discretionary and non-discretionary investment advisory
services to both individual and institutional clients, and financial planning, family office services, and estate and generational
wealth planning services to individual clients. 1919 is also the investment manager to mutual funds.
1919 tailors investment advisory services to client needs, and manages client portfolios according to the investment guidelines
and investment objectives defined by the client on their investment policy statement. The firm’s investment professionals
work directly with individual and institutional clients to develop these investment policy statements and tailor portfolios to
reflect individual client considerations including time horizon, risk tolerance, liquidity needs, restrictions on investing in
specific securities or types of securities, portfolio income and cash flow needs, and tax considerations. The investment policy
statements are not static, and periodically reviewed with clients and modified to meet clients’ changing needs. Investment
professionals primarily focus on, but are not limited to, liquid mid- to large-cap stocks and investment grade fixed income
securities, while also using third-party managers to supplement with strategies they believe complement these core assets. For
1 Unless otherwise stated, references to 1919 also includes Arthur Karafin Investment Advisors (“AKIA”), a department of 1919. AKIA is not a
separately registered investment advisor.
4 | P a g e
certain client accounts, 1919 directs the investment of client assets in mutual funds. From time to time, 1919 presents a variety
of alternative investments, including private equity, hedge funds, and real estate investments, to clients if appropriate. Clients
can define investment restrictions and/or positive screenings with respect to any of their accounts (or specific assets within
the accounts), such as restricting investments in specific securities, types of securities, industries, or sectors. The performance
of accounts will differ (potentially significantly) from the performance of other accounts in the same strategy, without similar
restrictions, considerations or different entry points.
Clients should promptly notify us if any significant life or financial changes occur so we may assist with adjusting your
investment portfolio accordingly.
In addition to the core offering of tailored investment management, 1919 also manages a variety of investment strategies that
can be made available to clients through direct accounts or certain wrap platforms. These strategies include the following:
Type
Strategies
Responsible
Investing
▪ SRI / ESG Climate Aware Equity
▪ SRI / ESG Balanced
▪ SRI / ESG Full Range Duration Fixed Income
▪ Inclusive Investing
▪ Impact Equity
Equity
▪ Core Growth Equity
▪ Growth Opportunity
▪ High Dividend Growth
▪ Equity Income
▪ TOP Aggressive
▪ SRI / ESG Equity
▪ SRI / ESG Catholic Values Equity
▪ SRI / ESG International ADR Equity
▪ SRI / ESG Intermediate Duration Fixed
Income
RI Sharia Investing
▪ Quality Growth Equity
▪ Multi-Cap Core Equity
▪ Disruptive Innovation Equity
▪ Global Growth Equity-ADR
▪ Real Estate
▪ Dividend Growth Equity
Fixed
Income
Balanced
▪ Intermediate Municipal Fixed Income
▪ Full Range Duration Fixed Income
Core Taxable Intermediate Duration
Core Taxable Short Duration
Core Municipal Intermediate Duration
Core Municipal Short Duration
▪ Balanced Multi-Strategy Growth
▪ Balanced Multi-Strategy Income
▪ Balanced Multi-Strategy Growth & Income
▪ Intermediate Duration Fixed Income
▪ Intermediate Govt/Credit Fixed Income
Tax Responsive Intermediate Duration
Tax Responsive Short Duration
Municipal 1-10 Year Ladder
California Municipal Long Income Focused
National Municipal Long Income Focused
▪ TOP Moderate
▪ TOP Balanced
▪ TOP Conservative
C. Strategies
1919 largely provides discretionary investment management services, which involve 1919 making the investment decisions for
client accounts. However, 1919 also provides certain clients with non-discretionary investment advisory services. When 1919
provides non-discretionary investment advisory services, the client directs investment decisions, including whether to approve
1919’s investment recommendations. If 1919 provides non-discretionary advice, then 1919 will implement the
recommendations only after receiving the client’s approval.
1919’s non-discretionary investment advisory services include:
providing another financial firm, if that firm is itself a 1919 client, with, and continuously monitoring and
updating, a model investment portfolio that it, in turn, can implement for accounts of its own clients; or
reviewing, monitoring and/or making investment recommendations for specific client accounts.
D. Additional Services
5 | P a g e
Family Office Services
1919 offers family office services for which fees are assessed on a client-by-client basis based on account value and servicing
level required. Such fees are separate from and in addition to investment management fees. These services, which represent
an extension of 1919’s core business of providing comprehensive investment counsel, can include (i) outsourced Chief
Investment Officer, (ii) financial planning services (see below), (iii) administrative services, (iv) coordinating outsourced tax
preparation and reporting services, and/or (v) providing consolidated and/or customized reporting. Family office services
may be on either a one-time or ongoing basis. 1919 will have a conflict of interest when evaluating or recommending any of
its affiliates’ services, which we mitigate by performing such evaluations and making such recommendations solely in the
interests of clients. 1919 may delegate certain family office services to third parties or may refer clients directly to the providers
of such services. 1919 will not be responsible for a third party’s provision of services.
Financial Planning Services
Our investment professionals work with clients to ascertain their financial goals and circumstances. We offer financial planning
with additional investment advisory services (specifically, discretionary investment management) at the wishes of the client.
For clients who have greater than routine financial planning servicing needs, 1919 reserves the right to negotiate a separate fee
prior to providing services. 1919 will consider a client request to waive this fee at its discretion, including, without limitation,
for a client that has not already retained 1919 as its investment manager and does so in connection with, or after, receiving
financial planning services. 1919 can also provide financial planning services together with certain third parties that have
expertise in certain specialties, such as insurance. 1919 is not responsible for advice or services provided by such third parties.
Once we have provided a finalized financial plan, the client decides whether to implement or instruct 1919 to implement the
recommendations based on their needs and preferences.
Financial plans are designed to help clients assess their financial situation and pursue their long-term financial goals and
objectives. The financial planning process is meant to be a collaborative experience that is customized to the complexity of a
client’s financial circumstances. To make the most of the planning services, we recommend that clients establish clear and
measurable financial goals and provide specific and accurate information. At the beginning of the planning process, clients are
asked to provide information about their individual financial situation, including cash flow needs, investment goals, objectives,
and risk tolerance. We rely on the information that the client provides to create a personalized financial plan, and therefore, it
is critical that we gather as complete a picture of the client’s financial situation as possible. For this reason, we request additional
financial information, such as bank and brokerage statements, employee benefits statements, insurance policies, etc., all of
which will assist us in understanding the client’s financial situation.
Clients should notify us promptly if any significant life or financial changes occur so we may assist with adjusting the financial
plan as needed. We will use the information a client provides to prepare our financial planning recommendations and guidance,
which cover a variety of topics. As appropriate, this can include:
Cash Flow Analysis: Analyze monthly spending needs and income.
Retirement Analysis: Goal funding retirement analysis calculating the results of a plan by running trials, where each
trial has a different sequence of returns. The analysis identifies the probability of funding all goals without exhausting
all resources over the estimated time horizon.
Net Worth Overview: A snapshot of the client’s current financial position looking at the difference between assets
and liabilities.
Asset Allocation Comparison: Compares the allocation of the client’s current portfolio to a target risk-based portfolio.
Identify changes associated with investment strategies and allocation changes the client should consider.
Insurance Needs Analysis: Analyzes whether the client has adequate investment assets and resources to support their
family if the client passes away earlier than expected (e.g., compares income needs to income sources across multiple
disability periods, identifies how an extended long-term care event could adversely impact the client’s investment
portfolio).
In general, the financial plan is intended to assist clients in assessing their individual financial goals and to serve as a basis for
6 | P a g e
further analysis and discussion between 1919, our client, and our client’s legal, and tax advisers toward developing a suitable
investment strategy for pursuing financial goals.
Estate and Generational Wealth Planning
In addition to investment advisory services, 1919 also offers estate and generational wealth planning, trust advisory services,
and philanthropic planning. 1919 can design a plan for managing and distributing a client’s assets in the event the client
becomes incapacitated or passes away. This process includes working with our clients’ other advisers, such as attorneys and
accountants, to create estate planning documents that can be used to achieve our clients’ goals, such as a will, revocable trust,
power of attorney, and healthcare power of attorney (or healthcare proxy). If appropriate for the client’s circumstances, we
also advise on tax-efficient generational wealth planning strategies such as Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts, Charitable
Remainder Trusts, Charitable Lead Trusts, Irrevocable Life Insurance Trusts, Marital Trusts and gifts to minors.
Philanthropic Planning Services
Federal law provides incentives to donors making a gift to charity. These include income, gift and estate tax deductions as
well as tax-exempt status for various types of charitable entities, including private foundations and Donor Advised Funds.
After meeting with clients and understanding their goals, we might suggest utilizing a type of charitable planning vehicle, such
as a Donor Advised Fund or private foundation. Although 1919 does not provide tax advice, we are able to guide clients
through the planning process and help them think through the issues and possibilities.
Scope and Limits of Financial, Estate and Generational Wealth, and Philanthropic Planning Services
Topics or Areas Not Covered. Our financial, estate and generational wealth, and/or philanthropic plans, may not address every
aspect of a client’s financial life or intentions (e.g., areas not covered include analysis of property and casualty, homeowners,
and excess liability coverage, etc.). In addition, a topic may not be included in a financial, estate, generational wealth, or
philanthropic plan for a variety of reasons (for example, because we did not receive sufficient data from the client to complete
an analysis); unless we explicitly state otherwise, a client should not take any such omission as an indication that the topic is
not applicable to their particular situation.
No Verification of Outside Assets Analyzed. In developing a financial plan for a client, we generally consider and analyze
information relating to assets that a client holds at other financial institutions if the client has provided us the relevant
information. In considering such information, we will assume that the information that the client has provided is accurate and
will not take any steps to verify or ensure the accuracy of information regarding any assets that are managed by parties other
than 1919.
No Tax or Legal Advice. Our firm does not provide tax or legal advice, nor does 1919 prepare legal documents or tax returns.
A client should not consider any information that is presented in a financial, or trust and estate plan regarding potential tax
considerations as tax or legal advice and should not rely on such information for the purpose of avoiding any tax penalties or
liabilities. As we do not provide legal or tax advice, we recommend coordinating with a client’s independent legal and tax
advisers during the financial planning process so that they may assess any legal and tax issues relating to the strategies we
recommend. If a client is not comfortable involving those advisers during planning, they should separately consult with a
client’s legal or tax advisors to review the client’s personal circumstances.
Residency Assumption in Our Plans. Unless a client has explicitly informed us otherwise, our financial, estate and generational
wealth, and philanthropic planning services assumes that the client, and their family and heirs are U.S. citizens or residents
and subject to U.S. taxes. Our services may therefore not be applicable to or appropriate for those who are subject to non-
U.S. tax jurisdictions and requirements.
Implementation of Recommendations. No current or potential client is required to implement or to instruct 1919 to implement any
of the recommendations that we provide in a financial, estate, generational wealth or philanthropic plan or to do so through
our firm. Clients who would like us to assist in implementing the recommendations will need to enter into an investment
7 | P a g e
advisory agreement.
No Obligation to Update the Plan. We will be under no obligation to update a plan to reflect changes in the client’s life events or
financial situation that occur after the plan is created unless requested to do so.
Mutual Fund Investment Manager
1919 is the investment manager to two mutual funds that are registered with the SEC. As investment manager, 1919 is
responsible for implementing each fund’s investment strategy in compliance with each fund’s investment guidelines and
restrictions. In fulfilling this responsibility, 1919 manages all trading activity and valuation oversight with respect to each fund.
1919 is overseen by the funds’ boards through U.S. Bank’s Advisor Managed Portfolios.
ITEM 5. FEES AND COMPENSATION
Generally, clients pay a management fee on a quarterly basis based on the client’s aggregated assets under management with
1919 at that point in time. Requests for alternative fee arrangements are considered using several factors, as discussed below,
and approval is at the sole discretion of 1919.
The fee schedule set forth below is 1919’s standard fee schedule as of January 1, 2025. Fees vary for a variety of circumstances
that include, but are not limited to, (i) clients who opened accounts under prior fee schedules, (ii) clients who transition their
accounts to 1919 from a firm that is affiliated with, or acquired by, 1919, (iii) clients who obtain 1919 investment advisory
services pursuant to agreements such clients have with other firms, such as wrap fee program sponsors and 1919 affiliates,
Stifel Trust Company, National Association (“Stifel Trust”) and Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated (“Stifel Nicolaus”),
or (iv) clients who have greater servicing needs. In addition, 1919 offers different fee schedules in certain programs of other
firms in which 1919 investment advisory services are available. 1919 and clients will mutually agree to a fee structure prior to
entering into an agreement. Clients have the option to purchase investment products that 1919 recommends through brokers
or agents that are not affiliated with us.
Institutional Accounts
Account
Type
Individual Accounts
Based on a $2 million minimum account or client
relationship
1.00% on the first $3 million under management
0.70% on the next $7 million under management
0.50% on the next $30 million under management
0.75% on the first $10 million under management
0.60% on the next $15 million under management
0.50% on the next $25 million under management
Equity /
Balanced
(excluding
AKIA clients)
0.40% on the balance
0.40% on the balance
0.50% on the first $3 million under management
0.30% on the first $10 million under management
Fixed
Income
(excluding
AKIA clients)
AKIA
0.35% on the next $7 million under management
0.25% on the next $30 million under management
0.20% on the balance
0.50% to 1.00% of assets under management
0.20% on the next $15 million under management
0.15% on the next $25 million under management
0.10% on the balance
0.50% to 1.00% of assets under management
Clients may request to household accounts serviced by 1919 (that is, group accounts of different clients together when those
clients have a pre-existing relationship to one another for an aggregate value that qualifies for a lower fee tier). It is a client’s
responsibility to determine whether they have multiple accounts that could be placed in a billing household and potentially
result in lower overall fees. Special tax rules may apply to the inclusion of IRAs and Keogh plans in a household, and 1919
may decline requests to combine retirement accounts subject to ERISA with non-retirement accounts into a single fee
household.
1919 considers several factors in determining whether to approve requests for non-standard fees or relationship/client
8 | P a g e
minimum assets including, but not limited to, longevity of relationship, aggregate assets under management across asset types,
additional services contracted (e.g., 1919’s family office or financial planning services). Approval for such requests are at the
sole discretion of 1919. For example, 1919 has approved non-standard fee rates for certain clients with different types of assets
in a single account, such as in mutual funds, exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”), private investment funds and other collective
investment funds.
Wrap Fees
In a wrap fee program, a client pays an asset-based fee to the program sponsor that typically covers the sponsor’s investment
advisory and custody services, and the cost of brokerage transactions executed by the sponsor or by a broker- dealer designated
by the sponsor. 1919’s fees are included in the wrap fee where 1919’s Wrap Fee Strategy manages the client’s wrap fee account.
If managed outside of 1919’s Wrap Fee Strategy, clients pay 1919 a fee for such investment management services that is
separate from the wrap fee paid to the sponsor. Clients with accounts in a wrap fee program should contact the program’s
sponsor for information regarding fees and expenses associated with program accounts.
Employee Investment Programs
1919 offers certain investment programs exclusively to 1919 employees, children, parents, and in-laws. The standard fee rates
and minimum account sizes for these programs are as follows:
Program
Minimum Account Size
Fund Asset Allocation Program
$10,000
Investment Strategies Program
$100,000
Fees
Range of 0.35% to 0.50% of assets under
management
Range of 0.35% to 0.50% of assets under
management
Range of 25% to 50% discount to the fee schedule
below:
Tailored Investment Strategy
$500,000
(Minimum Relationship)
1.00% on the first $3 million under management
0.70% on the next $7 million under management
0.50% on the next $30 million under management
0.40% on the balance
From time to time 1919 will also agree to negotiated fee arrangements for family members of 1919 employees at 1919’s
discretion.
Mutual Fund Investment Manager
With respect to the mutual funds for which 1919 serves as investment manager, 1919 is compensated based on the
corresponding fund’s average daily net assets as follows:
Fund
1919 Financial Services Fund
Management/Advisory Fee Rate
0.80%
1919 Socially Responsive Balanced Fund
0.65% up to and including $100 million
0.61% of assets in excess of $100 million and up to and including $200 million
9 | P a g e
Fee Billing
Billing Methods. 1919’s standard forms of client agreements include client authorization for 1919 to collect (or debit) 1919’s
agreed-upon fees directly from the client’s account. To do so, 1919 sends an invoice to the client’s custodian for fee(s) due to
1919 or by electronically instructing the custodian to remit payment. 1919 considers client requests to instead collect fees by
invoicing the client directly and has agreed to do so for certain clients. 1919, in its sole discretion, has the right to refuse
requests for this alternative billing method. The fees are based on market value as of the last business day of the applicable
billing quarter.
Arrears and Advance Fee Billing Frequency. Excluding AKIA and clients of the former Rand & Associates, 1919 generally
charges fees quarterly in arrears – i.e., billing of fees at the end of the quarter during which 1919 provided the services covered
by the fees. In addition, 1919 has agreed with certain clients to bill fees in advance or at monthly, semi-annual or other intervals.
Where 1919 provides tax and certain other services, it generally bills separate fees for such services on an annual basis.
AKIA fees are due in advance, at the beginning of the quarter to which such fees apply. The fee is calculated based on the
value of the assets under management as of the close of business on the last day of the preceding calendar year or, for new
accounts, as of the account funding date. AKIA will adjust an account’s value accordingly in the event of (i) a withdrawal that
equals or exceeds 20% of the account’s value (at close of business on date of withdrawal) and is at least $200,000, or (ii) an
addition that equals or exceeds 20% of the account’s value (at close of business on date of addition) and is at least $200,000.
Any such adjustments generally will take effect with respect to the next quarterly fee charged during the year.
In 2018, 1919 acquired Rand & Associates, a San Francisco-based investment advisor. Clients of Rand & Associates prior to
1919’s acquisition generally continue to be billed in advance on a quarterly basis and calculated based on the value of the assets
under management as of the close of business on the last day of the preceding quarter. Clients being serviced primarily from
1919’s San Francisco office and who were onboarded after the acquisition are generally billed in advance as described above.
If a client is billed in arrears and terminates their relationship with 1919 during a billing period, 1919 will be entitled to a final
pro-rated fee for the billing-period-to-termination-date period during which 1919 provided the client with services. If the
client’s agreement authorizes 1919 to collect or debit agreed-upon fees directly from the client’s account, 1919 typically will
collect its final fee, as well as any other owed but still unpaid agreed-upon fees, in this manner. Alternatively, 1919, in its
discretion, may instead send the client an invoice for such fees.
Clients subject to advance billing who terminate their relationship with 1919 will receive a pro-rated refund for the period
beginning with the termination effective date and ending with the last day of the billing period.
1919 pays fee refunds by mailing checks to client custodians for deposit into the accounts previously managed by 1919, directly
depositing funds into client accounts, or, if the client requests, mailing checks directly to the client.
Where 1919 manages client accounts as a sub-adviser to another firm or as part of a wrap fee program in which another firm
collects and pays 1919 its investment advisory fees, clients should contact such other firm for information on potential fee
refunds in the event 1919’s investment advisory services are terminated.
Middle and Back Office Services Agreements
1919 provides certain current and former affiliates with limited middle- and back-office services and support on a one-off
basis. 1919 does not hold itself out as offering such services as generally available and therefore, 1919 does not make any
representation that costs under such agreements are negotiated at an arms’-length basis. The service and support level varies
by party but can include technology and trading. Personnel delivering services under these bespoke agreements are employed
by 1919. Fees for these services are determined by the service levels required and vary on a case-by-case basis.
Other Fees and Expenses
In addition to the fees 1919 charges for its services, a client generally will incur custody, and brokerage and trade execution
10 | P a g e
costs, for securities transactions 1919 effects or recommends for the client’s account. Expenses paid to third parties in
connection with the acquisition or disposition of investments are borne by the client. These expenses include wire fees,
appraisal fees, third-party tax preparation fees, SEC fees on certain security transactions, tax withholding on certain securities,
custody specialty reporting or accounting fees, wrap fees (when applicable), mutual fund, ETF or private investment imbedded
fees, brokerage commissions (direct or in the form of a spread), prime brokerage and other account fees, custodial expenses,
agent bank and other bank service fees, and other investment costs, fees, and expenses incurred in connection with completed
investments. Clients that hold investments in American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”) typically pay fees charged by the ADR’s
depositary bank when the ADR pays dividends – these small fees are deducted from the dividends. When an ADR is purchased
or sold in a non-U.S. market for the ADR’s underlying ordinary shares, associated conversion and foreign exchange fees
typically are included in the ADR price paid or received by the client’s account. Brokerage and other transaction costs are also
discussed in more detail in Item 12 – “Brokerage Practices”.
From time to time, 1919 employees are asked to serve as trustee or executor for client trusts or as executors of client estates.
Such trusts and estates are not funded by or for the benefit of 1919 and therefore, to the extent a 1919 employee is offered
standard compensation for their services, which is entirely at the discretion of the client, such compensation is not subject to
a management fee offset
From time to time, 1919 benefits from group discounts which have been negotiated with various vendors and service providers
alongside Stifel affiliates. Such discounts, or the failure to obtain a discount, does not impact 1919’s clients as clients do not
bear organizational or other costs outside of management fees and their own, respective custody, brokerage and trade
execution costs.
ITEM 6. PERFORMANCE-BASED FEES AND SIDE-BY-SIDE MANAGEMENT
1919 does not charge performance-based fees.
ITEM 7. TYPES OF CLIENTS
1919 provides investment advisory services to high-net-worth individuals and families, endowments, foundations, other
charitable organizations, public/government-related clients, pension and profit-sharing plans, investment companies,
corporations, individual retirement plans, partnerships, trusts, and estates. For new client accounts and relationships, 1919
generally charges the minimums described in Item 5 of this brochure. As described in Item 5, 1919 in its sole discretion can
waive otherwise applicable minimums for any one or more clients.
In addition, 1919 reserves the right to refuse or terminate business for any reason, except as otherwise prohibited by law, even
if such business would meet applicable standard 1919 account and relationship minimums in accordance with the investment
advisory agreement or applicable services agreement.
ITEM 8. METHODS OF ANALYSIS, INVESTMENT STRATEGIES AND RISK OF LOSS
The investment strategy descriptions in this brochure will not apply to all clients as many will have portfolios that are
customized to their investment objectives, guidelines, needs and preferences. Each investment strategy involves risk of loss,
which clients should be prepared to bear. There is no express or implied assurance or guarantee that client investment
objectives will be met.
1919 employs comprehensive sector and company analyses to manage risk in client portfolios. In evaluating assets in a
portfolio construct, 1919 both conducts its own research and analyzes what we believe to be credible third party data taking
11 | P a g e
into account current economic and market conditions applicable to the asset, and other factors, as appropriate (e.g., the nature
of the asset, the ratings assigned by certain rating agencies, the operational history of the issuer, the issuer’s cash position,
leverage and cash flow, the issuer’s position in the industry, the structure of the issuer’s debt obligations and political dynamics).
1919 monitors asset specific factors and market trends that influence an asset’s performance and, consequently, the current
composition of a client portfolio to achieve the client’s objectives at any given point in time.
1919 cannot provide any assurance that target investment opportunities will materialize or, if they do, that clients will realize
a return on the securities of any particular company or portfolio of companies. There can be no assurance that any investment
strategy will be able to generate returns for clients or that returns will be in proportion to the investment risks. Additionally,
distributions resulting from certain types of investments may be subordinated in the event of a default under any credit facility
by the issuer of securities held by the client. Forecasts or forward looking statements of market trends or returns are not
guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee or indicator of future results. All investments carry a degree of risk
and clients may lose a portion or all of their invested capital.
1919’s core investment capabilities are rooted in the construction of actively managed portfolios. The exact portfolio
composition is unique to each client based on their risk tolerance, return objectives, cash flow needs, tax considerations and
other factors salient to the particular client.
When selecting individual large and mid-cap equities, 1919:
focuses on high quality companies, employing a hybrid bottom-up and top-down approach;
employs independent proprietary research to discover unrecognized or underutilized sources of value;
focuses on companies with demonstrable competitive advantages to enhance long-term returns;
emphasizes a portfolio of high-quality companies to reduce fundamental risk and significant loss; and
identifies promising sectors that have the potential to offer above-average opportunities and diversification benefits.
When selecting investment grade fixed income investments, 1919:
manages our fixed income portfolios actively and tailors portfolio construction with an aim to achieve a total return
consistent with client goals;
capitalizes on our bond sector research to identify undervalued and overvalued sectors and utilize proprietary credit
research to address potential positive and negative credit ratings changes; and
makes duration and term structure decisions that are top-down while our sector weighting decisions are bottom up.
If consistent with a client’s guidelines and objectives, 1919 employs a “core and satellite” approach to asset management. To
complement 1919’s internally managed, core investment strategies listed above, we engage third party investment managers
who focus on specific sub-asset classes or styles of management and who 1919 believes execute those strategies particularly
well. When selecting third party investment managers, 1919’s Third Party Committee evaluates investment philosophy and
process, experience, reputation, and costs. 1919 typically accesses third party managers via mutual funds, exchange traded
funds (ETFs), private investment funds or other collective investment vehicles, including REITs, managed by such managers.
From time to time, 1919 also accesses such managers by retaining them as sub-advisors to manage client assets.
Material Risks
The following is a summary of the material risks associated with asset types that 1919 typically seeks to include in client
accounts and the methods of analysis used by the firm. Clients should be aware that not all of the risks listed herein will pertain
to every account as certain risks may only apply to certain investment strategies. Furthermore, the risks listed herein are not
intended to be a complete description or enumeration of the risks associated with the significant strategies and significant
methods of analysis used by 1919. Among other things, an account may invest in assets that are underperforming or non-
performing and/or in securities of issuers who are under financial stress. By their nature, such investments involve a high
degree of financial risk, and there can be no assurance that a client’s return objectives will be realized or that there will be any
return of capital.
General Investment Risk. Stocks, bonds and other equity and fixed income securities may decline in value for any one or
12 | P a g e
more of several reasons. The potential reasons these securities may decline in value are almost without limit and may not be
foreseeable. Some common reasons securities may decline in value include:
Actual or anticipated negative developments affecting the issuer of the securities or the assets backing the securities, including:
losses, earnings, revenues, expenses, profit margins, cash flow, growth rates, component unavailability, dividend levels or other
financial or business metrics that do not meet expectations; deterioration in financial position; competition; changes in
technology or governmental regulation; loss of or failure to obtain customers, personnel or necessary government approvals;
product failures; lawsuits, corruption; government investigations or enforcement actions; loss of intellectual property
protection; and loss or reduction of benefits such as exclusive distribution or supplier rights.
Actual or anticipated negative developments affecting (a) one or more industries in which the issuer of the securities
participates, (b) in the case of governmental issuers, the tax base, economy or other attributes of the country or region where
the issuer is located; or (c) in the case of securities backed by specified assets, the type of assets backing the securities, such as
mortgages, finance receivables, toll roads, hospitals, etc.
Broader declines in security prices, including global, regional, country-specific, asset class-specific (e.g., equity, fixed income)
and investment style-specific (e.g., growth, value) price declines. Potential reasons for these declines include changes in investor
preferences; actual or anticipated global, regional or country-specific political, economic, regulatory or social developments
(e.g., government changes, monetary policy, inflation, demographic changes, recessions), wars, terrorism, civil unrest, labor
stoppages, infrastructure problems (e.g., power outages), and disasters such as earthquakes, floods, droughts, epidemics, oil
spills, nuclear incidents, tsunamis, volcano activity, hurricanes and tornadoes.
Below Investment Grade Risk. Below investment grade fixed income securities, which are sometimes referred to as “junk”
bonds or high yield securities, are fixed income securities that are rated below Baa or BBB and unrated fixed income securities
of comparable quality. These securities have a higher risk of declining in value and defaulting than investment grade (i.e.,
higher quality) fixed income securities. In particular, below investment grade fixed income securities typically are more volatile
and involve greater credit risk than investment grade fixed income securities. See “High Volatility Risk” and “Credit Risk”
below for explanations of these risks. Below investment grade fixed income securities also tend to be less liquid and more
susceptible to general investment risk than investment grade fixed income securities. See “Illiquidity Risk” and “General
Investment Risk” for explanations of these risks.
Convertible Securities Risk. A convertible security is a bond, debenture, note, preferred stock, right, warrant or other
security that may be converted into or exchanged for a prescribed amount of common stock or other security of the same or
a different issuer or cash within a particular period of time at a specified price or formula. A convertible security generally
entitles the holder to receive interest paid or accrued on debt securities or the dividend paid on preferred stock until the
convertible security matures or is redeemed, converted or exchanged. Before conversion, convertible securities generally have
characteristics similar to both debt and equity securities. Convertible securities ordinarily provide a stream of income with
generally higher yields than those of common stock of the same or similar issuers. Convertible securities generally rank senior
to common stock in a corporation’s capital structure but are usually subordinated to comparable nonconvertible proportionate
securities.
Convertible securities generally do not participate directly in any dividend increases or decreases of the underlying securities
although the market prices of convertible securities may be affected by any dividend changes or other changes in the underlying
securities. Investments in convertible securities may be subject to the risks that prevailing interest rates, issuer credit quality
and any call provisions may affect the value of the securities. Rights and warrants entitle the holder to buy equity securities at
a specific price for a specific period of time. Rights typically have a substantially shorter term than do warrants. Rights and
warrants may be considered more speculative and less liquid than certain other types of investments in that they do not entitle
a holder to dividends or voting rights with respect to the underlying securities nor do they represent any rights in the assets of
the issuing company. Rights and warrants may lack a secondary market.
The value of convertible securities tends to decline as interest rates rise and, because of the conversion feature, tends to vary
with fluctuations in the market value of the underlying securities.
13 | P a g e
ETF Risk. Investments in exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”) (which may, in turn, invest in equities, bonds, and other financial
vehicles though the ETF’s overall performance may not mimic any individual asset or asset type that it holds) may involve the
duplication of certain fees and expenses. By investing in an ETF, a strategy becomes a shareholder of that ETF. As a result,
investors in a strategy that invests in ETFs are indirectly subject to the fees and expenses of the individual ETFs. These fees
and expenses are in addition to the fees and expenses that investors in the strategy directly bear in connection with the strategy’s
own operations. If the ETF fails to achieve its investment objective, the strategy’s investment in the ETF may adversely affect
its performance. In addition, because ETFs are listed on national stock exchanges and are traded like stocks listed on an
exchange, the following may occur:
The strategy may acquire ETF shares at a discount or premium to their NAV, and
The strategy may incur greater expenses since ETFs are subject to brokerage and other trading costs.
Finally, because the value of ETF shares depends on the demand in the market, we may not be able to liquidate the ETF
holdings at the most optimal time, adversely affecting the strategy’s performance.
Emerging Market Risk. Non-U.S. investment risk is increased for securities issuers and markets in emerging market
countries. Emerging markets tend to have economic, political and legal systems that are less developed and less stable than
those of the United States and other developed countries. In addition, securities markets in emerging market countries may
be relatively illiquid and subject to extreme price volatility. See “Illiquidity Risk” and “High Volatility Risk” below.
Fund Investments. Unless otherwise agreed with a client, 1919 may invest any client account partly or wholly in shares of
mutual funds, exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”), private investment funds and other collective investment funds, including
funds that invest in other funds and funds managed by 1919 or its affiliates (“Affiliated Funds”). Situations in which a 1919
portfolio manager may invest client accounts in Funds, including Affiliated Funds, include (i) to provide diversified investment
exposure for client accounts or account portions, and (ii) to provide investment exposure in areas where 1919 believes a Fund
manager has greater expertise.
Mid Cap Risk. Mid cap risk is the additional risk of loss typically associated with investments in securities of mid cap
companies. Negative company-specific developments tend to cause securities of mid cap companies to decline in value more
than securities of large cap companies. See clause (i) of “General Investment Risk” above for examples of such developments.
Reasons for mid-cap companies’ increased risk of loss from such developments include the tendency of
mid cap companies to have more limited product lines, operating histories, markets and financial resources, and also to be
dependent on more limited management groups. Securities of mid cap companies also tend to be more volatile and less liquid
than securities of large cap companies. See “High Volatility Risk” and “Illiquidity Risk” below.
Non-U.S. Investment Risk. Non-U.S. investment risk is the additional risk of loss typically associated with investments in
securities of non-U.S. issuers. Investments in securities of non-U.S. issuers tend to involve greater risk than investments in
U.S. issuers. This increased risk arises from factors that include: many non-U.S. countries having securities markets that are
less liquid and more volatile than U.S. securities markets; political and economic instability in some non-U.S. countries; lesser
availability of issuer and market information in some non-U.S. countries; and less rigorous accounting and regulatory standards
in some non-U.S. countries. In addition, currency exchange rate fluctuations may have a greater negative effect on the value
of investments in securities of non-U.S. issuers.
Private Placement Risk. If appropriate for qualified clients, 1919 invest assets in private investment funds from time to time,
the shares or units of which are not publicly traded or freely transferable. Investments in private placements generally will be
subject to significant Illiquidity Risk as a result, and this typically will make such investments more susceptible to losses. See
“Illiquidity Risk” below for an explanation of this risk.
REIT and Real Estate Risk. The value of a strategy’s investments in real estate investment trusts (“REITs”), a type of Fund
that invests in real estate-related assets, may change in response to changes in the real estate market. Investments in REITs
may subject clients to additional risks including, but not limited to declines in the value of real estate, changes in interest rates,
lack of available mortgage funds or other limits on obtaining capital and financing, overbuilding, extended vacancies of
properties, increases in property taxes and operating expenses, changes in zoning laws and regulations, casualty or
14 | P a g e
condemnation losses, and tax consequences of the failure of a REIT to comply with tax law requirements. These additional
risks typically will be magnified for REITs that leverage their investments – i.e., use debt financing to increase real estate
investment exposure above the amount of the REIT’s net assets
Short Selling Risk. Short selling involves selling securities that are not owned by the seller and borrowing the same securities
for delivery to the purchaser, with an obligation to replace the borrowed securities at a later date. Short selling allows a portfolio
to profit from declines in market prices to the extent such decline exceeds the transaction costs and the costs of borrowing
the securities. However, since the borrowed securities must be replaced by purchases at market prices in order to close out
the short position, any appreciation in the price of the borrowed securities would result in a loss upon such repurchase.
Purchasing securities to close out the short position can itself cause the price of the securities to rise further, thereby
exacerbating the loss. Short-selling exposes a portfolio to unlimited risk with respect to that security due to the lack of an
upper limit on the price to which an instrument can rise.
Small Cap Risk. Small cap risk is the additional risk of loss typically associated with investments in securities of small cap
companies. Negative company-specific developments tend to cause securities of small cap companies to decline in value more
than securities of large cap and mid cap companies. See clause (i) of “General Investment Risk” above for examples of such
developments. Reasons for small cap companies’ increased risk of loss from such developments include the tendency of small
cap companies to have more limited product lines, operating histories, markets and financial resources, and also to be
dependent on more limited management groups. Securities of small cap companies also tend to be more volatile and less liquid
than securities of large cap and mid cap companies. See “High Volatility Risk” and “Illiquidity Risk” below.
Responsible Investing Criteria Risk. Responsible Investing strategies may have a smaller universe of available investments
than investment strategies that do not apply responsible investing criteria and this may prevent investment in certain otherwise
attractive opportunities. Also, responsible investing criteria may underperform other types of investments or the market as a
whole.
Additional Risks Information
Geographic Concentration Risk. Geographic concentration risk is the risk of loss from concentrating investments in a
particular geographic region, such as a single U.S. state or region, and not more broadly diversifying investments across
multiple geographic regions. An investment management portfolio that concentrates investments in a particular geographic
region will have a greater risk of loss from developments that negatively affect securities issuers with significant business or
other financial exposure to the region. Examples of such developments include: regional disasters such as earthquakes,
hurricanes and floods; deteriorating finances of regional governmental securities issuers (e.g., states, municipalities); regional
infrastructure problems such as power outages or transport facility shutdowns or restrictions; and economic, demographic or
regulatory changes that negatively affect the region’s business environment.
Industry Concentration Risk. Industry concentration risk is the risk of loss from concentrating investments in a particular
industry and not more broadly diversifying investments across multiple industries. An investment management portfolio that
concentrates investments in a particular industry will have a greater risk of loss from developments that negatively affect
companies in that industry. Examples of such developments include: regulatory or other government policy changes that
negatively affect the industry; changes in business methods, technologies or consumer preferences that reduce demand for the
industry’s products or services; alternative product/service competition from new or pre- existing industries; and shortages
of, or increased costs for, industry personnel, raw materials or product components.
Issuer Concentration Risk. Issuer concentration risk is the risk of loss from concentrating investments in individual securities
(i.e., making larger investments in individual securities) instead of more broadly diversifying investments across a larger number
of securities. An investment management portfolio that concentrates investments in individual securities will have a greater
risk of loss from developments that negatively affect the issuers of those securities. See clause (i) of “General Investment
Risk” above for examples of developments that may negatively affect the value of a particular issuer’s securities.
Credit Risk. Credit risk, which is sometimes referred to as “default risk”, is the risk that the value of a fixed income
15 | P a g e
security will decline because of investor perception that the security issuer’s or guarantor’s future payment of the principal
and/or interest obligation represented by the security has become less likely, increasing the likelihood of default; or actual
default by the issuer or guarantor of the security.
Extension Risk. Extension risk is the risk that issuers of fixed income securities, including mortgage-backed and other asset-
backed securities, will repay their obligations more slowly than the market anticipates in the event market interest rates rise.
This repayment extension may cause the prices of these securities to fall because their interest rates are lower than market
rates and they remain outstanding for longer than originally anticipated.
High Volatility Risk. High volatility risk is the risk of loss associated with investments that tend to fluctuate in value more
than other investments. An investment management portfolio with high volatility risk typically involves more speculative
investments than a portfolio that does not have such risk. More speculative investments increase the client’s risk of loss. In
addition, high volatility increases the chance that a client will incur significant investment losses if and when the client or the
client’s investment manager decides to sell one or more securities held in the client’s account.
Illiquidity Risk. Illiquidity risk is the risk that securities held in a client’s account may be difficult to sell at prices close to
recent valuations because few or no market participants are willing to purchase the securities at such prices. This risk, which
generally is greater during times of market turmoil, may result in increased losses (or lesser gains) relative to sales of securities
for which more active trading markets exist. Illiquidity risk may also result in client accounts realizing lower prices from
smaller-sized sales of securities, including municipal bonds that usually trade in larger amounts. For example selling a single
$5,000 lot of a municipal bond for a client’s account may result in a lower per-bond price than a contemporaneous sale of a
$100,000 lot of the same bond.
Interest Rate Risk. Interest rate risk is the risk that market interest rates will rise, causing fixed income security prices to fall.
This risk stems from the tendency of increases in market interest rates to generally make payment obligations associated with
already-outstanding fixed income securities less attractive to investors and therefore the securities themselves less valuable.
The risk of securities price declines caused by interest rate increases generally is higher for fixed income securities with longer-
term maturities.
Prepayment Risk. Issuers of many fixed income securities, including certain mortgage-backed and other asset-backed
securities, have the right to pay their payment obligations ahead of schedule. If interest rates fall, an issuer may exercise this
right. If this happens, the investor’s ability to reinvest the prepayment proceeds and obtain the same yield will be diminished
because of the lower market interest rates. In addition, prepayment may cause the investor to lose any premium paid upon
purchase of the security.
Counterparty Risk. Actual events involving reduced or limited liquidity, defaults, non-performance, or other adverse
developments that affect financial institutions or other companies in the financial services industry, including banks and other
custodians of an investor’s funds and securities, or impact the financial services industry generally, as well as concerns or
rumors about any events of these kinds, have in the past and may in the future lead to market-wide liquidity problems, defaults
on financial obligations, non-performance of contractual obligations, and other adverse impacts on these financial institutions,
investors that deposit funds and securities at these institutions, lenders and borrowers of these institutions, and other
companies in the financial services industry. For example, on March 10, 2023, Silicon Valley Bank, was closed by the California
Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as receiver.
Investor concerns regarding the U.S. or international financial systems could result in less favorable commercial financing
terms, including higher interest rates or costs and tighter financial and operating covenants, or systemic limitations on access
to credit and liquidity sources, thereby making it more difficult to acquire financing on acceptable terms or at all. Any decline
in available funding or access to cash and liquidity resources could, among other risks, adversely impact the ability to meet
operating expenses, satisfy financial obligations, liquidate portfolio holdings, withdraw capital, or fulfill other obligations, or
result in breaches of financial and/or contractual obligations. Any of these impacts, or any other impacts resulting from the
factors described above or other related or similar factors not described above, could have material adverse impacts on
portfolio holdings, fund performance, or business operations.
16 | P a g e
Regulatory Risk. The financial services industry is subject to complex and extensive regulation by numerous primary Federal
regulators, including: the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Deposit and
Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). State chartered financial institutions also are subject to regulation and supervision by state
bank regulatory agencies. Further, all federally insured depository institutions are subject to certain oversight and supervision
by the FDIC as the insurer of deposit accounts. These regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in connection with their
supervisory and enforcement activities.
Moreover, the laws, rules and regulations comprising such regulatory framework are constantly changing, as are the
interpretation and enforcement of existing laws, rules and regulations. The regulatory framework governing the financial
services industry is currently under close Congressional and regulatory agency scrutiny and is the subject of pending and
contemplated legislation and rulemaking initiatives that could drastically alter the manner in which financial services companies
operate and are structured. Financial services organizations are also subject to non-industry specific regulatory requirements
that may be impactful, such as compliance with economic sanctions, cyber security and data privacy.
Banking Industry Investment Risk. The results of operations of banking institutions may be materially affected by general
economic conditions, changes in the level of interest rates, national and local cycles in real estate and the monetary and fiscal
policies of the Federal government. In addition, over the last couple of years, the world’s financial markets have experienced
extraordinary market conditions, including the failure of the credit markets to function and extreme volatility in the securities
market. As a result, U.S. and foreign financial regulators undertook unprecedented regulatory action and continue to consider
and implement other measures to stabilize U.S. and global financial markets. While the U.S. financial market appears to have
reached a level of stability, there continues to be a high level of troubled depository institutions and therefore likely
consolidation in the financial services industry and uncertainly in other markets that affect the U.S. market.
Other Financial Services Company Risk. Many of the investment considerations discussed in connection with banks,
mortgage brokers and insurance companies also apply to other financial services companies. These companies are all subject
to extensive regulation, rapid business changes and volatile performance dependent on the availability and cost of capital,
prevailing interest rates and significant competition. General economic conditions significantly affect these companies. Credit
and other losses resulting from the financial difficulty of borrowers or other third parties have a potentially adverse effect on
companies in this industry.
Derivatives Risk. Derivatives, which may be used in Funds in which 1919 client assets are invested, are financial instruments
that have a value which depends upon, or is derived from, a reference asset, such as one or more underlying securities, pools
of securities, options, futures, indexes or currencies. Derivatives may result in investment exposures that are greater than their
cost would suggest; in other words, a small investment in a derivative may have a large impact on strategy’s performance. The
successful use of derivatives generally depends on the Fund manager’s ability to predict market movements.
Derivatives are subject to a number of risks, including without limitation Illiquidity Risk, Interest Rate Risk, Credit Risk and
General Investment Risk (each described above) and the following additional risks:
Risk of default by the other party to the derivatives transaction;
Risk that the derivatives transaction may result in losses that partially or completely offset gains in other
positions; and
Risk that derivative instruments may be mispriced or improperly valued and that changes in the value of the
derivatives may not correlate perfectly with the underlying asset or security.
Cyber Security. 1919 is subject to certain risks associated with cyber security incidences. In general, cyber security incidents
can result from deliberate attacks or unintentional events, including inadvertent disclosures, and can arise from either
external or internal sources for purposes of misappropriating assets or sensitive information; corrupting data, equipment, or
systems; or causing operational disruption. Although 1919 takes protective measures and endeavors to modify its systems,
software and networks as circumstances warrant, these remain vulnerable to hacking/unauthorized access, misuse, social
engineering, viruses, malware, ransom ware, denial of service attacks, other malicious code and other events that could have
an impact on the security of our information.
17 | P a g e
We believe we have established reasonable controls to secure our systems, so they work as intended. Furthermore, we conduct
reasonable due diligence on our material service providers both at the stage of initial procurement and on an ongoing basis.
Cyber incidents affecting 1919, or any of our service providers, could affect business operations; create impediments to trading
transacting business which could result in financial losses, violations of applicable privacy and other laws, regulatory fines,
penalties, reputational damage, reimbursement or other compensation costs, or additional compliance costs. 1919 has plans
in place to respond to both internal and external breaches by making a financial and operational assessment, quickly recovering
and resuming operations, protecting all of the firm’s books and records, and allowing our clients to transact business as
promptly and prudently as reasonably practicable. In addition, 1919 seeks contractual terms requiring our service providers
to notify us of any security breaches or inadvertent disclosures that may affect us or the data we manage. However, there is
no guarantee that (i) such efforts will succeed, (ii) service providers will promptly notify us, especially when we do not directly
control the systems of third-party service providers, or (iii) clients will not be harmed because of cyber-attacks or similar issues
Artificial Intelligence (“AI”). 1919 may rely on programs and systems from third party vendors that utilize AI, machine
learning, probabilistic modeling and other data science technologies (“AI Tools”). As of the date of this brochure, 1919 utilizes
AI Tools to streamline operational processes and not as part of determining investment decisions.
Personnel. The success of each strategy depends in part upon 1919’s ability to attract and retain talented investment
professionals, the skill and expertise of the investment professionals who manage each client’s investment strategy. There can
be no assurance that such professionals will continue to be associated with 1919 throughout the entire term of a client’s
investment advisory relationship and a loss of the services of key personnel could temporarily impair 1919’s ability to provide
services. Moreover, there can be no assurances that such professionals will remain in the same roles at 1919 for the entirety
of their tenure. The fiduciary duties owed by such professionals to a client would be modified accordingly. In addition, 1919
investment professionals involved in providing advisory services to a client may in the future cease providing such services
while nonetheless remaining employed by 1919 if the employee’s role has changed. Separately, there is ever-increasing
competition among industry participants for hiring and retaining qualified investment professionals. There can be no assurance
that 1919 personnel will not be solicited by and join competitors or other firms and/or that 1919 will be able to hire and retain
any new personnel that it seeks to maintain or add to its roster of investment professionals.
Risks Related to Investment Analysis and Market Conditions. 1919 seeks to conduct reasonable and appropriate analysis
and due diligence of its investments based on the facts and circumstances applicable to each investment. The objective of such
analysis and due diligence is to identify attractive investment opportunities based on the facts and circumstances surrounding
an investment, to identify possible risks associated with that investment. When conducting due diligence and making an
assessment regarding an investment, 1919 relies on available resources, including information provided by the target company,
third party research and 1919’s proprietary research. As a result, the due diligence process is at times be subjective. Accordingly,
1919 cannot be certain that investment research with respect to any investment opportunity will reveal or highlight all relevant
facts (including irregular accounting, employee misconduct and other fraudulent practices) that are necessary or helpful in
evaluating such investment opportunity, including the existence of contingent liabilities. In the event of fraud by a company
whose securities clients own, there is a greater likelihood of clients suffering a partial or total loss of capital invested in such
company, and there can be no assurance that any such losses will be offset by gains (if any) realized with respect to a client’s
other investments.
In all cases, projections are only estimates of future results that are based upon assumptions made at the time that the
projections are developed. There can be no assurance that the assumptions will be accurate or that the estimated results will
be achieved, and actual results can vary significantly from the projections. General economic, political and market conditions,
which are difficult to predict, can have a material adverse impact on the reliability of such projections. If, due to extraordinary
market conditions or other reasons, clients were to incur substantial losses, the revenues of 1919 would decline accordingly.
Such losses increase the risk of hampering 1919’s ability to (i) retain employees and (ii) provide the same level of service to
clients as the firm has in the past.
The success of a client’s activities will be affected by general economic and market conditions, such as inflation rates, economic
uncertainty, changes to tax codes, environmental and socioeconomic circumstances (including wars, terrorist acts, political
18 | P a g e
uncertainty or widespread health crises).
ITEM 9. DISCIPLINARY INFORMATION
There are no reportable legal or disciplinary events for 1919 or its employees.
ITEM 10. OTHER FINANCIAL INDUSTRY ACTIVITIES AND AFFILIATIONS
As a wholly-owned subsidiary of Stifel, 1919 has the following business arrangements with affiliates that clients may wish to
consider:
(1) 1919 Investment Companies. 1919 serves as investment adviser to the 1919 Financial Services Fund, and the 1919
Socially Responsive Balanced Fund. 1919 receives a fee for the investment advisory services it provides to these
investment companies and also seeks and obtains reimbursement from these investment companies for certain
Fund-related marketing expenses 1919 incurs. As described in Item 11 of this brochure, 1919 will have certain
financial incentives that conflict with client interests in certain limited situations associated with investments in
shares of these investment companies.
(2) Stifel Trust Company, National Association. 1919 and Stifel Trust Company, National Association (“Stifel Trust”),
a national trust bank, have entered into a Relationship and Investment Management Agreement pursuant to which
1919 serves as investment manager and relationship manager for certain trust and other accounts of Stifel Trust
that have been sourced by 1919. Also, under this agreement, 1919 may refer clients – but does not do so exclusively
- to Stifel Trust for trust services and these services are expected to typically involve Stifel Trust, as trustee, retaining
1919 to manage accounts opened as result of the referral. As described in Item 12 of this brochure, 1919 will have
a conflict of interest in making such a referral.
(3) Affiliated Broker-Dealer Firms. Stifel is a financial services holding company that owns multiple broker- dealer
firms, including Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated (“Stifel Nicolaus”), Century Securities Associates, Inc.,
Miller Buckfire & Co., LLC, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. (“KBW”), Eaton Partners, LLC, Vining Sparks IBG,
LLC, and First Empire Securities, Inc. As described in Items 11 and 12 of this brochure, 1919’s affiliation with
Stifel-owned broker-dealers presents 1919 with conflicts of interest in certain situations. In addition, 1919 has soft
dollar arrangements under which client commissions are used to pay Stifel Nicolaus and KBW for certain research
services. As described in Item 12, these arrangements involve conflicts of interest due to 1919’s affiliation with
Stifel Nicolaus and KBW.
(4) Affiliated Paid Referral, Managed Account, and Model Portfolio Arrangements. 1919 has arrangements with its
affiliate, Stifel Nicolaus, pursuant to which (i) Stifel Nicolaus, in certain limited situations, may receive cash
compensation from 1919 for referring clients to 1919, (ii) 1919 manages accounts of Stifel Nicolaus clients as a
sub-adviser to Stifel Nicolaus and pursuant to agreements 1919 enters into directly with Stifel Nicolaus clients, (iii)
1919 provides non-discretionary model portfolios to Stifel Nicolaus, which Stifel Nicolaus uses to manage
accounts for its clients, and (iv) Stifel Nicolaus provides a non-discretionary model portfolio to 1919, which 1919
uses to manage a client’s account. Refer to Item 14 of this brochure for additional information on 1919’s affiliated
and unaffiliated paid referral arrangements.
19 | P a g e
ITEM 11. CODE OF ETHICS, PARTICIPATION OR INTEREST IN CLIENT TRANSACTIONS AND
PERSONAL TRADING
A. Code of Ethics
1919 has established and approved a Code of Ethics (the “Code”) that sets forth standards of ethical conduct for employees
and is designed to address and avoid potential conflicts of interest as required under Rule 204A-1 of the Advisers Act. Among
other things, the Code prescribes standards for treating clients ethically, addresses conflicts of interest issues, and supplements
personal trading and operating procedures. The Code provides guidance in specific areas, including but not limited to,
confidentiality of 1919 and client information, personal investments, gifts and entertainment, protection of persons who
engage in “whistle blowing” activities from retaliation and personal political activities (e.g., “pay-to-play”).
Existing and prospective clients can request a copy of the Code by mailing a written request to:
1919 Investment Counsel, LLC
ATTN: Compliance
One South Street, Suite 2500 Baltimore, MD 21202
B. Discussion of Potential Conflicts of Interest Associated with Employee Personal Trading
Subject to the requirements of 1919’s Code, 1919 employees are permitted to make personal investments in the same securities
1919 invests in for client accounts, as well as in securities that 1919 does not invest in for client accounts. Employees can also
make personal investments in related securities or financial instruments, such as options, futures and warrants. When done in
compliance with 1919’s Code, employees can make personal investments at or about the same time 1919 is making the same
investments or related investments for client accounts. These possibilities involve potential conflicts between client interests
and the personal interests of the employees – i.e., the potential that employee trades in a security will compete with client
trades for the same or related securities or otherwise adversely affect the prices obtainable for client trades. 1919 believes that,
for the liquid larger cap securities that constitute 1919’s primary investments for clients, the risk of employee personal trading
and associated conflicts disadvantaging clients is small or nonexistent because neither employee trades nor client trades
generally are large enough to significantly affect market prices.
1919 addresses the potential conflicts presented by employee personal trading by prohibiting employee personal trades that
have a higher risk of affecting securities prices. Specifically, the Code prohibits personal trades of all sizes in certain, generally
less liquid securities (equity securities of certain small cap companies, municipal fixed income securities) when 1919 has open
orders at its trading desk for the same or related securities, subject to certain exceptions described in the Code. 1919 applies
personal trades in certain generally more liquid securities, such as corporate bonds and equity securities of larger cap
companies, to this prohibition only if the trade size exceeds de minimis amounts specified in the Code.
C. Discussion of Potential Conflicts of Interest Associated with Affiliated Fund Investments
As part of 1919’s investment advisory services, 1919 can invest client assets in shares of mutual funds, private investment
funds or other collective investment vehicles for which 1919 or one or more 1919 affiliates act as investment manager
(“Affiliated Funds”). See Item 8 of this brochure for information on the circumstances in which 1919 considers investing
client assets in Affiliated Funds.
Although 1919 does not charge account-level fees on client assets it invests in Affiliated Funds managed by 1919, 1919 will
have a conflict of interest when making such an investment if the aggregate fee rate payable by such Affiliated Fund to 1919
exceeds the rate of the account-level fee 1919 would receive if 1919 did not make the investment.
If permitted by applicable laws, 1919 does charge account-level fees on client assets it invests in Affiliated Funds managed by
its Stifel affiliates. These account-level fees are paid to 1919 and are in addition to the Affiliated Fund-level fees that 1919’s
affiliates receive from these investments. The aggregate fees received by 1919 and its affiliates from such investments typically
will exceed the account-level fees that 1919 would receive if 1919 did not make such an Affiliated Fund investment.
20 | P a g e
In the above scenarios, 1919 will have an incentive to make and hold investments in Affiliated Funds for clients in order to
maximize the aggregate compensation to 1919 and its affiliates. 1919 addresses the conflict of interest presented by this
incentive by selecting Affiliated Funds (and unaffiliated Funds) for investment, and making decisions to continue to hold their
shares, based solely on the best interests of clients and without regard for the amount of compensation payable to 1919 and
its affiliates in connection with such investments. As described in Item 8 of this brochure, 1919’s Third Party Committee at
least annually reviews any Affiliated Funds (other than Affiliated Funds managed by 1919) that it has selected for investment
to determine whether they continue to be appropriate investments. In addition, 1919 makes investments in Affiliated Funds
managed by 1919 only to provide diversified investment exposure for client accounts or account portions or in response to
client requests for such investments. 1919 will comply with laws applicable to the investment of client assets in Affiliated
Funds.
D. Discussion of Conflicts of Interest Associated with Participation in Offerings Underwritten by
Affiliates
Certain Stifel-owned broker-dealer firms participate in the underwriting of securities offerings for companies and other issuers.
See Item 10 of this brochure for the names of certain of these firms. If participating in such an offering is in the best interest
of the client or if directed by the client, 1919 can purchase such securities offerings for which one or more such firms is a
member of the offering syndicate for client accounts. D u e t o 1 919’s affiliation with these firms, 1919 will have an incentive
to benefit them by causing client accounts to purchase securities in such offerings. 1919 addresses this conflict of interest by
making investment decisions solely in the interests of its clients and without regard for any benefits particular investments
result in for affiliates. Also, participation in any such offering will be subject to compliance with applicable law.
E. Discussion of Potential Conflicts of Interest Associated with Private Investments
As noted in Item 8 of this brochure, 1919 from time to time recommends certain private investments to qualifying clients. 1919
will be subject to a conflict of interest in making such a recommendation if it has, or is seeking, a client relationship with any
one or more of the private investment’s sponsors, service providers, or any of such firms’ personnel – i.e., firms and personnel
who will benefit from investments in the private investment. In this situation, 1919 will have a conflict between the interests
of clients who are potential investors in the private investment and 1919’s interest in currying favor with such firms and
personnel (by recommending the investment) so that they are favorably inclined to establish a client relationship with, or
maintain or add to an existing client relationship with, 1919. 1919 addresses this conflict of interest by recommending private
investments solely in the interest of the clients to whom it is making such recommendations.
ITEM 12. BROKERAGE PRACTICES
To the extent practical and consistent with client directions and applicable laws, 1919 seeks to obtain best execution when
selecting broker-dealers to execute securities trades for client accounts. 1919 defines best execution as placing trades such that,
considering all appropriate circumstances, the value of 1919’s investment decisions is maximized over time for clients. For
equity securities trades, commission cost is one factor considered, but is not necessarily determinative. In seeking best
execution for such trades, 1919 typically considers research it receives from broker-dealers, as and to the extent described
below.
1919 generally selects broker-dealers to execute securities trades only if 1919’s Investment Policy Committee has approved
the broker-dealer. The Investment Policy Committee, which meets quarterly, oversees 1919’s brokerage practices and is
currently comprised of 1919’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Investment Officer, Head Trader, Director of Finance, Chief
Administrative Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, and certain senior portfolio managers.
1919 investment and trading personnel proposes broker-dealers for Investment Policy Committee approval for reasons that
include the broker-dealer’s execution capabilities, expertise and personnel, and also research the broker-dealer provides (in the
21 | P a g e
case of broker-dealers proposed for equity securities trading). The Investment Policy Committee typically considers these
factors, as applicable, and also information regarding the proposed broker-dealer’s financial position.
Unless otherwise noted, orders portfolio managers place with 1919’s Trading Desk to buy or sell securities are considered not-
held orders, and are placed for execution with an approved broker-dealer at the discretion of a 1919 trader. The factors 1919
traders consider when selecting broker-dealers to execute securities trades and seeking best execution generally are as follows:
Competitiveness of commission rates for equity trades and of spreads for fixed income trades
Any ‘external costs’ relevant to the execution (i.e. any external costs charged by third parties which are related to the
execution of the transaction and which are directly passed on to a client, such as, execution venue fees, clearing and
settlement fees and any other fees paid to third parties)
Speed and accuracy of trade execution, and likelihood of execution and settlement
Broker commitment of own capital as necessary
Likely market impact
Electronic trading, reporting and clearing capabilities
Back office clearing and settlement capabilities and responsiveness
Specialty abilities in particular markets and securities
Broker familiarity with 1919 investment focus
Broker provision of useful market information and research
Size and nature of the order;
Nature of the market for the financial instrument
Any other consideration deemed relevant to the execution of client transactions (e.g., such as the degree of liquidity
and volatility in the market)
Prior experience trading with 1919
Not all factors are applicable for every trade. 1919 determines the reasonableness of commissions charged by considering
commission rates then prevailing in the market for similar-sized trades in similar securities, as well as the overall quality of
the trade execution services provided for the benefit of 1919’s clients. In addition, as and to the extent described below,
1919 considers the value of research it receives.
1919’s fixed income traders seek best execution for fixed income securities trades by placing dealers in competitive situations
and utilizing offers and bids from numerous local and national broker-dealers. The fixed income traders review the market
environment, the new issue calendar, and secondary offerings to help determine a competitive price for the bonds they are
trading. By seeking to obtain the highest bid when selling securities, or selecting the broker-dealer with the lowest-priced
offers, 1919 generally seeks to ensure that clients obtain best execution on fixed income securities trades.
For wrap fee program accounts or other arrangements in which clients pay asset-based fees for services that include execution
of agency trades, 1919 typically selects the program’s or arrangement’s sponsor or the sponsor’s designated broker-dealer to
execute equity trades, since the client has already paid for that firm’s execution of such trades via the wrap fee or other asset-
based fee. In such instances, 1919 typically compares trade execution prices against current market quotations for
reasonableness and otherwise is not in a position to, and does not otherwise, monitor for best execution. This means the
directed brokerage disclosures in below apply for all wrap fee programs and other arrangements in which clients pay asset-
based fees for services that include execution of agency trades.
For one or more client accounts in wrap fee programs and such other asset-based-fee arrangements, 1919 in its discretion can
deviate from the approach described in the above paragraph and instead select other broker-dealers to execute equity trades
(causing trade-specific commissions to be incurred, in addition to the wrap fee or other asset-based fee) if 1919 determines
the execution-related benefit of doing so is likely to outweigh the added commission and other costs involved.
Subject to compliance with applicable laws, 1919 will cause an affiliated broker-dealer, such as Stifel Nicolaus, to execute
22 | P a g e
trades only for (i) clients in wrap fee programs sponsored by the affiliated broker-dealer, or (ii) clients that direct 1919 to use
such affiliated broker-dealer.
1919’s Investment Policy Committee conducts a quarterly review of 1919 trading for clients, which includes review of
(i) 1919’s allocation of transactions and commissions to broker-dealers, (ii) commission rates and other trading-related fees
paid, (iii) 1919 research analysts’ ratings of broker-dealers, (iv) soft dollar arrangement-related transactions, and (v) 1919
traders’ ratings of executing broker-dealers on certain best execution- related factors.
1919’s Use of Client Commissions to Obtain and Pay for Research
As noted above, 1919 regularly receives research from broker-dealers it uses to execute securities trades for client accounts.
For equity trades, 1919 generally considers the value of such research in selecting broker-dealers to execute trades and in
determining the reasonableness of the commissions charged.
Where 1919 considers the value of research, it does so by considering:
soft dollar arrangements 1919 has established;
ratings 1919’s research analysts assign to executing broker-dealers based on research services these broker- dealers
have provided; or
for certain equity investment strategies, research-based broker-dealer preferences communicated by the strategy’s
portfolio manager.
For certain equity securities trades, 1919’s traders consider target commission amounts that are part of soft dollar arrangements
1919 has established with certain executing broker-dealers. Each arrangement includes an annual target commission amount
that 1919 seeks, but is not obligated, to cause client accounts to pay the broker-dealer in return for trade execution and research
that is used to benefit clients as described below. The soft dollar arrangements are structured to comply with the safe harbor
under Section 28(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which permits an investment adviser to pay more than the lowest
available commission in return for trade execution and eligible research if the investment adviser determines in good faith that
the commissions paid are reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage and research provided, viewed in terms of the
specific trade or the investment adviser’s overall responsibilities to client accounts. 1919’s Investment Policy Committee
approves and periodically reviews the arrangements, including the target commission amounts and research services, and
periodically reviews the arrangements to determine that the commissions paid meet this reasonableness standard.
For certain equity securities trades for which 1919 does not consider soft dollar arrangements, 1919’s traders consider ratings
1919’s research analysts periodically assign to certain of 1919’s approved executing broker-dealers based upon research the
broker-dealers have provided to them that aids in furthering 1919’s performance of its investment-decision- making
responsibilities to clients.
For equity securities trades in certain 1919 investment strategies, 1919 can consider the research-based preferences
communicated by the strategy’s portfolio manager before soft dollar arrangements or analyst ratings in selecting broker-dealers
to execute equity securities trades.
The commissions 1919 causes client accounts to pay to obtain or pay for research (and trade execution services) as described
in this section typically are higher than they would be if 1919 did not consider research in selecting brokers to execute trades.
1919 does not require that research obtained or paid for with commissions be used only to benefit the accounts that paid the
commissions, and there is no guarantee that each account will benefit from research paid for by their commissions in each
instance. 1919 generally uses research obtained or paid for with commissions to benefit a broad range of client accounts. 1919
does not seek to allocate the benefits of research obtained or paid for with commissions to client accounts in proportion to
the commissions such accounts paid for such research.
However, 1919 generally seeks to cause a broad range of client accounts to pay commissions to obtain or pay for research so
that client accounts do not receive the benefits of the research without having to contribute to its cost. Exceptions to this
23 | P a g e
approach apply for (i) client accounts for which the use of a specific executing broker is directed, and (ii) client accounts in
wrap fee programs and client accounts that pay brokers asset- based fees for services that include trade execution. Although
accounts of clients in these categories generally do not contribute to the cost of research obtained or paid for with 1919 client
commissions, these accounts typically do receive the benefits of such research.
When 1919 uses client commissions to pay for or obtain research, 1919 receives a benefit since it does not have to produce
the research itself or pay for the research with its own money. As a result, 1919 has an incentive to select a broker-dealer based
on its interest in receiving research. Also, as noted in Item 10 of this brochure, 1919 has soft dollar arrangements under which
client commissions are used to pay Stifel Nicolaus and KBW, each an affiliated broker-dealer, for certain research services
they provide to 1919. Because of 1919’s affiliation with Stifel Nicolaus and KBW, 1919 has an incentive to implement these
arrangements in order to use 1919 client commissions to benefit its affiliates, Stifel Nicolaus and KBW. The affiliates are part
of the firms overall vote process and are not afforded any advantage or accommodation through the vote due to their status.
1919 addresses this conflict – potentially using 1919 client commissions to benefit the firm’s affiliates - by having its
Investment Policy Committee review the continued appropriateness of these arrangements (including the value of the research
to 1919’s investment decision-making) on a quarterly basis and holding the arrangements to the same standards to which the
Committee holds soft dollar arrangements involving research provided by unaffiliated firms.
The research 1919 obtains and pays for with client commissions can include:
Advice as to the value of securities, the advisability of investing in, purchasing or selling securities, and the
availability of securities or purchasers or sellers of securities; and
Analyses and reports concerning issuers, industries, securities, economic factors and trends, portfolio strategy and
the performance of accounts.
Specific types of research 1919 obtains and pays for with client commissions consist of: (i) fundamental, quantitative and
technical issuer, industry, sector, market, economic and policy research reports and analyses, (ii) portfolio strategy research,
(iii) meetings and calls with company management representatives and analysts and access to investment conferences, (iv)
information and analysis on company activities, operations and properties relevant to the making of investment decisions, and
(v) assistance in further developing and refining a valuation framework 1919 uses in making investment decisions. The research
is generated by either an executing broker-dealer or a third party.
Under 1919’s policy, research paid for with client commissions must be eligible under the Section 28(e) safe harbor and must
be used only to provide lawful and appropriate assistance to 1919’s performance of its investment decision-making
responsibilities. 1919’s Investment Policy Committee determines whether or not to allocate a portion of an eligible research
service subject to a soft dollar arrangement to client commissions (i.e., soft dollars) and a portion to hard dollars (i.e., 1919’s
own money).
A research service for which 1919 makes such an allocation is generally referred to as a “mixed-use” service. Any allocation
for a mixed-use service will be in proportion to 1919’s good faith estimate of the value of the service for investment decision-
making assistance purposes and the value of the service for non-28(e)-eligible purposes, such as client communications. The
Investment Policy Committee will have a conflict of interest in making this allocation, given that 1919 by definition will pay
hard dollar costs out of its own pocket. The Investment Policy Committee will record in writing all mixed-used service
allocation decisions and will periodically review such decisions to confirm that they continue to be appropriate.
1919’s Practices When a Client Directs Brokerage (Also Applicable to Wrap Fee Program Accounts and Accounts in
Other Asset-Based Fee Trade Execution Arrangements)
If a client or wrap fee program sponsor directs 1919 to use a specific broker-dealer to execute securities trades, 1919 will do
so unless 1919, in its discretion, determines that selecting one or more other broker-dealers would result in better execution
and, in the case of a wrap fee program, the program sponsor permits this.
When clients or their wrap fee program sponsors direct 1919 to use a specific broker-dealer to execute securities trades, or
24 | P a g e
when 1919 uses a specific broker-dealer for clients in a wrap fee program or other arrangement involving payment of asset-
based fees for services that include trade execution to execute securities trades:
1919 will not negotiate the broker-dealer’s trade execution services or compensation for such services on behalf of
the client account
1919 will not be in a position to, and will not, monitor for best price and execution of trades the broker-dealer
executes for the client account.
The prices and execution quality achieved for the account may be less favorable than the prices and execution
quality 1919 achieves for other client accounts. In other words, directed brokerage and wrap fee programs and other
arrangements involving payment of asset-based fees for services that include trade execution may cost clients more
money.
1919 will not be able to aggregate trade orders of such client accounts with trade orders of other client accounts,
and this may prevent 1919 from being able to reduce trading costs for accounts that direct brokerage or that are in
wrap fee programs or other arrangements involving payment of asset-based fees for services that include trade
execution.
1919 generally will place trades for such accounts after placing trades for client accounts that do not direct 1919 to
use a specific broker-dealer and are not in wrap fee program or such other arrangements. This may result in such
accounts receiving worse prices on securities trades than other 1919 client accounts. Also, due to operational
requirements in wrap fee programs and other arrangements involving payment of asset-based fees for services that
include trade execution, 1919 tends to complete placing trades for accounts in wrap fee programs and such other
arrangements after trades for other directed brokerage accounts are completed.
In addition, 1919’s business relationship with a sponsor firm or broker-dealer may give 1919 an incentive to recommend that
a client or sponsor firm issue or continue such a direction, as described below. Conversely, 1919’s interest in receiving research
paid for with client commissions, instead of 1919’s own money, will give 1919 an incentive to recommend that a client or
sponsor firm terminate such a direction.
For a broker-dealer that is affiliated with 1919, such as Stifel Nicolaus, this affiliation will give 1919 an incentive to recommend
that a client issue or continue a direction to use such broker-dealer. 1919 mitigates this conflict of interest by prohibiting the
use of affiliated broker-dealers unless directed to do so by the client or approved by both the Head Trader and Compliance.
See Item 10 of this brochure for the names of certain 1919-affiliated broker-dealers.
A client or sponsor firm can terminate a direction to use a specific broker-dealer by notifying 1919 in writing.
Trade Aggregation and Allocation
1919’s policy is to treat all client accounts for which it exercises investment discretion impartially. If 1919’s trading desk
receives (from one or more 1919 portfolio managers) multiple orders for the same security on the same side of the market at
the same time, the trading desk typically will block the orders together to minimize execution costs and seek best execution.
Because portfolio managers manage accounts individually, however, the trading desk often will not receive such orders at the
same time and therefore will not block or aggregate the orders.
If an aggregated order is executed in multiple trades at varying prices, each client account participating in the order receives the
average price. U n d e r c e r t a i n c ircumstances, 1919 will exercise its discretion to make an exception to its standard
approach of aggregating, such as when multiple large trades would likely have an adverse market impact. In addition, trades for
wrap fee program clients and clients who direct their brokerage to a specific brokers-dealer generally will not be aggregated
with those of clients for which 1919 selects the executing broker-dealer. As a result, these clients would likely incur greater
trading costs and receive less favorable execution.
25 | P a g e
Most of 1919’s investments are in highly liquid securities. Aggregated orders 1919 places for such securities typically are
completely filled on the day the order is placed – i.e., the aggregate amount of securities desired to be purchased or sold is
actually purchased or sold. However, there may be circumstances in which aggregated trade orders are only partially filled.
1919 allocates partially filled orders pro rata, based on the amounts sought for participating client accounts, or in another
manner that 1919 concludes is fair and equitable to each client. Pro rata allocations will be subject to any minimum acceptable
amounts for each account. If the pro rata allocations result in odd block sizes, they will be rounded to the nearest acceptable
block size. If the order is only partially filled and the securities would be insignificant if spread over all accounts participating
in the trade, 1919 will remove an entire account objective from the trade. In this way, the amount of bonds or shares of equity
securities purchased or sold is significant to the accounts participating in the trade, and accounts with the same investment
objective are treated equally. If 1919 bases the allocation on reasons other than the preceding, it will maintain a record of this
decision, which includes a description of the reasons that the general allocation policy was not followed.
The usual practice of 1919 portfolio managers when submitting equity securities orders to 1919’s trading desk is to specify the
client account or accounts for which the order is being submitted, including the amount of equity securities to be purchased
or sold for each participating account. For fixed income securities trades, a portfolio manager will either also follow this
approach or will initially specify only an aggregate amount of the securities desired to be purchased without specifying the
accounts for which the securities are sought. This aggregate amount is based on an acceptable position size for all accounts
managed by the portfolio manager and then estimated by the portfolio manager to be eligible for the purchase. When the
securities are obtained in this situation, the portfolio manager will then allocate them across such accounts, generally on a pro
rata basis but subject to account-specific considerations such as (i) applicable investment restrictions, (ii) account cash position,
(ii) securities of issuer already held by account, and (iv) effect on account duration. 1919 considers these factors when
determining whether certain accounts initially estimated to be eligible for the purchase can receive more or less than a pro rata
allocation, including in some cases no allocation at all.
Dissemination and Implementation of Investment Decisions
1919 typically provides discretionary investment management services. As part of these services, the client’s 1919 portfolio
manager implements the investment decisions he or she makes for the client’s account by placing trades with 1919’s Trading
Desk for execution as described above. Because of the typically customized nature of 1919’s services and the related need to
individually consider each client’s or account’s particular needs and/or investment situation, a portfolio manager will determine
whether to implement similar investment decisions (e.g., the purchase of a particular stock) for different client accounts at
different times, and this may result in clients receiving different prices for the same investment. Alternatively, a portfolio
manager holds discretion as to submitting an aggregate order to 1919’s Trading Desk for the client accounts he or she manages
as described above.
In addition to providing and implementing discretionary investment management services, 1919 has agreed to provide certain
other financial firms with model investment portfolios, which such firms have the option to implement for accounts of their
clients. For these relationships, 1919’s policy is to endeavor to communicate all changes to such model portfolios to these
financial firms at approximately the same time 1919 portfolio managers are able to start implementing the change for client
accounts for which 1919 has implementation responsibility. In certain cases, a financial firm’s formatting or system
requirements for communicating model portfolio changes may delay 1919’s communication of model portfolio changes to
such firm. Also, any implementation delays by the financial firm receiving the model portfolio changes may extend the head
start 1919 has in terms of being able to implement the changes for client accounts for which 1919 has implementation
responsibility. The above factors could result in client accounts of financial firms receiving 1919 model portfolios obtaining
worse securities purchase and sale prices than 1919 obtains for its own clients.
Recommendation of Broker-Dealers, Custodians and other Service/Product Providers
1919 does not generally recommend clients to direct brokerage to particular broker-dealers, unless the client requests a
recommendation, which 1919 will make depending on the individual client’s specific needs and preferences.
26 | P a g e
Upon request, 1919 recommends custodians (typically banks or broker-dealer firms) to clients, as well as other service and
product providers such as providers of trust services, insurance policies, accounting and tax services and products, legal
services, and mortgage lending services on the basis of the client’s needs and 1919’s reasonable belief that the recommended
vendor can meet those needs. Certain of these service and product providers, such as Fidelity, may refer investment advisory
business to 1919, provide products or services to 1919, and/or provide 1919 with access to their representatives so that 1919
or other persons can promote 1919’s investment services or products to such representatives. In addition, certain of these
firms are affiliated with 1919, such as Stifel Bank & Trust (which 1919 may recommend as a lender) and Stifel Trust Company,
National Association (which 1919 may recommend as a custodian and/or provider of trust services). In these situations, 1919
will have a conflict between recommending the service and product provider in the client’s interest and recommending such
firm in order to (i) to obtain favorable terms on any products or services the recommended provider provides or may provide
to 1919, (ii) to preserve or obtain additional referred business or promotion-related access from the recommended provider,
and/or (iii) in the case of a recommended provider that is affiliated with 1919, to benefit its affiliate. The preceding statements
are qualified in that 1919 may recommend these service providers because we do not always recommend these parties for
services to clients. 1919’s recommendations are made solely in the best interest of the individual client without regard to
whether or not the recommended party is an affiliate or provides an incentive to 1919. Currently, 1919 has the conflicts of
interest in clauses (i) and (ii) above in situations in which 1919 recommends Fidelity and NFS as custodian. Each of Fidelity
and NFS provide 1919 with limited practice management and/or similar business services from time to time, typically at no
charge to 1919.
Also, with respect to Fidelity and NFS, the conflict of interest in clause (ii) will exist in part because of 1919’s participation in
the Fidelity Wealth Advisor Solutions® Program, through which Fidelity clients may be referred to 1919 as potential advisory
clients. 1919 will have an incentive to recommend these firms in order to influence their affiliate, Fidelity Personal Workplace
Advisors LLC (“FPWA”), to continue to authorize 1919 to receive referrals in this program.
In addition, when a client requests that 1919 recommend a custodian, 1919 will be subject to a conflict between its interest in
minimizing the number of client custodians with which 1919 has to interact, which will enable 1919 to minimize internal 1919
operational costs, and the client’s interest in receiving superior custody services. Consistent with 1919’s status as a fiduciary,
however, 1919 will base any recommendations of custodians, directed brokers, or other service and product providers only
on what it believes is in the best interests of clients. The main factors 1919 considers recommending custodians to clients
include the level of fees such custodians will charge clients for custody services, accounting and reporting capabilities, the level
of custody and account servicing such custodians provide to clients, and the manner in which such custodians interact with
1919 in its capacity as the client’s investment manager.
For clients referred to 1919 in connection with the Fidelity Wealth Advisor Solutions® Program, 1919 has agreed not to (i)
recommend that such clients transfer their brokerage accounts from Fidelity, NFS and their affiliates, or (ii) interfere with or
jeopardize a client’s relationship with any such firm, except in each case where 1919 believes its fiduciary duties to the client
require such action. 1919 has agreed to pay Fidelity Personal and Workplace Advisors LLC a one-time fee based on client
account assets for any violation of this agreement if the client transfers its brokerage account. These agreements and this fee
will pose a conflict of interest for 1919 by giving it a financial incentive to recommend that clients in the program maintain,
or continue to maintain, their brokerage accounts with Fidelity, NFS and their affiliates. See Item 14 of this brochure for
additional information on 1919 participation in the Fidelity Wealth Advisor Solutions® Program.
Trade Error Correction Policy
In the event of a trade error attributable to 1919, 1919’s general policy is to place the client in the position it would have been
in absent the error unless otherwise directed by the client. When an error is identified prior to settlement, 1919 normally will
move the trade to its error account. In such cases, the profit or loss resulting from the reversing transactions will be owned
by 1919.
The Investment Policy Committee, along with certain investment professionals, review trade errors to identify trends and
areas for improvements.
27 | P a g e
ITEM 13. REVIEW OF ACCOUNTS
Client accounts are generally reviewed at least annually by the portfolio manager for the account, typically with the assistance
of the portfolio associate or investment associate assigned to the account. Portfolio managers also receive a number of monthly
and quarterly reports and analytics for the accounts they oversee. Portfolio managers will generally review multiple accounts
together as part of a larger client relationship. Each review involves monitoring for adherence to client investment objectives,
guidelines, needs and preferences, including tax situation, and restrictions, as well as adherence to appropriate investment
allocations. This review is most often completed by a client meeting conducted annually to discuss the relationships and any
changes contemplated. These meeting can be in person or virtual.
The frequency and scope of the review for each account is based on a combination of the following factors: (i) the type of
client; (ii) the size and complexity of the relationship; (iii) the type of the client mandate; (iv) the type of investment product(s)
utilized; (v) general market conditions and associated factors; (vi) specific client needs and objectives; (vii) turnover in
investment management personnel; and (viii) change in client committee structure or management team.
Clients can opt-in to use the 1919 Client Portal, which is available online 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, to view account
information. The Client Portal is accessible at www.1919ic.com.
ITEM 14. CLIENT REFERRALS AND OTHER COMPENSATION
1919 compensates certain persons for client referrals. Some of these persons include 1919 affiliates in addition to unaffiliated
other investment advisers, broker-dealers, financial planners, and individuals, including clients. Such arrangements create a
conflict of interest for the firm making the referral because of the fee the firm will receive for making the referral. As noted
in Item 10 of this brochure, 1919 has paid referral arrangements with Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated an affiliated
firm. 1919 also has paid referral arrangements with certain unaffiliated firms. The terms of certain agreements require 1919 to
continue to compensate affiliates or third parties for prior client referrals for the duration of 1919’s relationship with the
referred client though the firm no longer participates in receiving new referrals.
If referrals made in accordance with a paid referral arrangement materialize into new clients, 1919 will compensate the referring
party for making the introduction. Compensation is generally based on a percentage of (i) the client’s annual management fee,
or (ii) the amount of the referred client’s assets managed by 1919. The range of compensation has included a recurring payment
of 20 – 50% of the client’s annual management fee. The payment typically is made quarterly based on 1919’s billing cycle.
Clients are not charged additional fees as a result of any 1919 referral arrangements. 1919 has entered into agreements with
these third parties that govern their referral activities. These agreements also contemplate that the third parties will have
involvement in 1919’s ongoing servicing of referred client accounts.
ITEM 15. CUSTODY
Client assets are held by qualified custodians that are selected by the client. Qualified custodians maintain the client assets in
a manner that segregates them from assets of other clients of the custodian. 1919 is deemed to have custody of the underlying
assets of many of its clients due to being able to deduct advisory fees, acting as trustee for the client, or having discretionary
authority over the client account. These accounts are also subject to a year-end audit by a major accounting firm that is a
member of, and examined by, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”).
Clients should carefully review the account statements they receive from their custodians and compare them to any account
statements they receive from 1919. Clients are discouraged from sending their funds (e.g., cash or checks made payable to
28 | P a g e
cash, to 1919 or to 1919 personnel) or securities (e.g., original stock certificates or limited partnership interest certificates,
originally signed promissory or demand notes) to 1919, but instead should send such assets directly to their custodians. In the
event that 1919 is in receipt of funds or securities, the firm promptly forwards them to the intended recipient.
ITEM 16. INVESTMENT DISCRETION
1919’s standard investment advisory agreement grants the firm discretionary authority over client accounts, authorizing 1919
to make purchase and sale decisions for client accounts or to select other advisers for the client. Alternatively, clients can elect
to enter into a non-discretionary agreement with 1919. Under such agreement, 1919 must receive client approval before
making any purchase and sale decisions for the client’s accounts.
Clients have the ability to place limitations on 1919’s investment authority. Specific client investment restrictions will limit
1919’s ability to manage a client’s account like accounts of other clients with the same or similar investment objectives and/or
guidelines but without similar client-imposed restrictions to varying degrees depending upon the nature of the restrictions.
This may impact the performance of the account relative to these other accounts and the benchmark index.
ITEM 17. VOTING CLIENT SECURITIES
1919 generally accepts proxy voting authority on behalf of clients that wish to grant 1919 proxy voting authority, and has
adopted a proxy voting policy and procedure that the firm believes are reasonably designed to comply with the requirements
of the Advisers Act. Unless directed otherwise by the client, the client opts out, or in the event of a conflict among clients,
1919 will vote all proxies for client accounts in a manner that is consistent with the client’s investment guidelines. As a result,
1919 would vote one client’s securities differently than the firm votes those of another client in accordance with differing
client investment guidelines.
In the absence of applicable investment guidelines, 1919 generally votes proxies in accordance with proxy voting guidelines
prepared by an independent proxy voting firm and approved by 1919’s Proxy Voting Committee. These guidelines seek to
maximize the economic interests of shareholders. For clients receiving responsible investing services, 1919 generally votes
proxies in accordance with responsible investing proxy voting guidelines prepared by this firm and approved by the Proxy
Voting Committee. 1919 can vote proxies other than in accordance with applicable guidelines, and in situations where such
guidelines do not cover a particular vote, if the Committee approves of such vote. The vote approval process will include
seeking to ensure that the vote does not involve a material conflict between the interests of 1919 and its clients. 1919 will
consider a conflict to be material if it is significant enough to potentially influence or appear to influence 1919’s decision in
the voting process.
Except for extraordinary circumstances, in any such instance, the material conflict will be resolved by the Proxy Voting
Committee, voting in accordance with the otherwise applicable approved guidelines (if any), or by obtaining the client’s
consent to the vote after disclosure of the conflict. Alternatively, in its sole discretion, the Proxy Voting Committee determines
whether to vote in accordance with the advice or recommendation of an independent third party.
In exercising its voting authority, 1919 will not consult or enter into agreements with officers, directors or employees of Stifel
Financial Corp. or any of its affiliates regarding the voting of any securities owned by its clients. An account owner can direct
1919 to refrain from voting a specific security, and name themselves or another person to so vote, while 1919 retains voting
authority over the other securities in the account. With respect to shares over which 1919 has voting authority, 1919 will not
decline to vote proxies except in extraordinary circumstances where 1919 believes that refraining from voting is in the client’s
best interests. Nor will 1919 accept direction from others with regard to the voting of proxies. 1919 will vote proxies related
to the same security differently for different clients in accordance with clients’ differing investment guidelines.
The Proxy Voting Committee will meet annually to review and approve proxy voting guidelines. 1919’s proxy voting policy at
29 | P a g e
all times shall be directed toward maximizing the value of the assets of managed accounts, for the benefit of the accounts’
ultimate owners or beneficiaries. On proxy vote matters specific to a company, such as the election of directors, the
appointment of auditors, granting of options, re-pricing of options, mergers and other material issues, the voting decision
typically shall be made in accordance with the proxy voting guidelines approved by the Proxy Voting Committee, consistent
with the policy of maximizing value.
There are times when 1919 is unable to vote a proxy or elects not to vote a proxy. Examples of these times include, but are
not limited to (1) the meeting notice was received too late, (2) fees imposed to exercise the vote are high and outweigh the
benefit of voting, or (3) a proxy voting service is not offered by the client’s custodian. In the event that a custodian does not
provide 1919 with the materials necessary to vote proxies for securities held in the client’s account, 1919 will be unable to vote
proxies and will so notify the client. For clients that grant 1919 proxy voting authority, a complete record and file of all votes
cast, and where appropriate, the reason therefor, shall be maintained by 1919 with a third party voting service, Institutional
Shareholder Services Inc. (ISS). Clients can obtain information on how their proxies were voted, and the more detailed policies
and procedures upon which this summary is based, by contacting 1919 at One South Street, Suite 2500, Baltimore, Maryland,
21202, Attention: Compliance Department.
ITEM 18. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
At this time, 1919 is not aware of any financial condition that is reasonably likely to impair 1919’s ability to meet its
contractual obligations to its clients. 1919 has not been the subject of any bankruptcy petitions, including in the past ten
years.
30 | P a g e